Rita Santos‐Rocha

1.5k total citations
66 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

Rita Santos‐Rocha is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Rita Santos‐Rocha has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 21 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 15 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Rita Santos‐Rocha's work include Pregnancy-related medical research (26 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (18 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (11 papers). Rita Santos‐Rocha is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy-related medical research (26 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (18 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (11 papers). Rita Santos‐Rocha collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Poland and United States. Rita Santos‐Rocha's co-authors include António Veloso, Marco Branco, Filomena Vieira, Anna Szumilewicz, Fátima Ramalho, Filomena Carnide, Susana Franco, Isabel Vieira, Rafael Oliveira and Łukasz Radzimiński and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Rita Santos‐Rocha

59 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rita Santos‐Rocha Portugal 15 272 115 102 101 101 66 561
Danilo Fernandes da Silva Canada 15 191 0.7× 72 0.6× 85 0.8× 101 1.0× 225 2.2× 84 688
Erica Taylor United States 6 241 0.9× 62 0.5× 22 0.2× 68 0.7× 72 0.7× 14 599
Elizabeth Bryant United Kingdom 11 83 0.3× 59 0.5× 20 0.2× 69 0.7× 53 0.5× 34 499
Dorota Sadowska Poland 11 95 0.3× 36 0.3× 49 0.5× 44 0.4× 101 1.0× 37 363
Phil Chilibeck Canada 12 360 1.3× 41 0.4× 398 3.9× 148 1.5× 106 1.0× 14 716
Ewelina Czenczek‐Lewandowska Poland 13 161 0.6× 20 0.2× 33 0.3× 65 0.6× 19 0.2× 40 414
Mei‐Fang Liu Taiwan 8 110 0.4× 45 0.4× 11 0.1× 39 0.4× 65 0.6× 13 510
W. Thorland United States 21 202 0.7× 150 1.3× 19 0.2× 459 4.5× 540 5.3× 57 1.2k
Penny B Githens United States 9 95 0.3× 93 0.8× 47 0.5× 16 0.2× 90 0.9× 11 881
Annelie Gutke Sweden 20 1.2k 4.2× 27 0.2× 88 0.9× 37 0.4× 48 0.5× 50 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Santos‐Rocha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Santos‐Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Santos‐Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Santos‐Rocha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Santos‐Rocha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Santos‐Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Santos‐Rocha. The network helps show where Rita Santos‐Rocha may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita Santos‐Rocha

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita Santos‐Rocha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita Santos‐Rocha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita Santos‐Rocha. Rita Santos‐Rocha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Wilczyńska, Dominika, et al.. (2024). Stress is not so bad—cortisol level and psychological functioning after 8-week HIIT program during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Public Health. 11. 1307998–1307998. 8 indexed citations
5.
Franco, Susana, et al.. (2023). Tendências do Fitness em Portugal para 2023. Retos. 48. 401–412. 8 indexed citations
6.
Wierzba, Jolanta, et al.. (2023). Can Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Maternal Exercise Affect Birth and Neonatal Outcomes—A Cross Sectional Study. Nutrients. 15(23). 4894–4894. 4 indexed citations
8.
Leźnicka, Katarzyna, Maciej Pawlak, Agata Gąsiorowska, et al.. (2022). Individual Characteristics and Pain Sensitivity during Pregnancy—A Cross-Sectional Study in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(21). 14151–14151. 1 indexed citations
9.
Santos‐Rocha, Rita, Simona Pajaujienė, & Anna Szumilewicz. (2022). ACTIVE PREGNANCY: Workshop on Promotion of Physical Activity in Pregnancy for Exercise Professionals. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Volume 15. 2077–2089. 4 indexed citations
10.
Martins, Alexandre Duarte, Rafael Oliveira, João Paulo Brito, et al.. (2021). Phase angle cutoff value as a marker of the health status and functional capacity in breast cancer survivors. Physiology & Behavior. 235. 113400–113400. 21 indexed citations
11.
Ramalho, Fátima, et al.. (2020). Responsiveness of the Calf-Raise Senior test in community-dwelling older adults undergoing an exercise intervention program. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0231556–e0231556. 4 indexed citations
12.
Apóstolo, João, Maria dos Anjos Dixe, Elzbieta Bobrowicz‐Campos, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness of a Combined Intervention on Psychological and Physical Capacities of Frail Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(17). 3125–3125. 18 indexed citations
13.
Carnide, Filomena, Andreia Moço, Maria J. Valamatos, et al.. (2018). Can the calf-raise senior test predict functional fitness in elderly people? A validation study using electromyography, kinematics and strength tests. Physical Therapy in Sport. 32. 252–259. 9 indexed citations
14.
Sousa, Pedro, Emília Duarte, Regina Ferreira, et al.. (2018). An mHealth intervention programme to promote healthy behaviours and prevent adolescent obesity (TeenPower): A study protocol. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(3). 683–691. 14 indexed citations
15.
Ramalho, Fátima, et al.. (2018). Effect of 6-month community-based exercise interventions on gait and functional fitness of an older population: a quasi-experimental study. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Volume 13. 595–606. 10 indexed citations
16.
Silva, Raquel, et al.. (2017). GENDER INEQUALITIES IN PORTUGUESE GYMNASTS BETWEEN 2012 AND 2016. Science of Gymnastics Journal. 9(2). 191–200. 6 indexed citations
17.
Santos‐Rocha, Rita, et al.. (2015). Comparison between overweight due to pregnancy and due to added weight to simulate body mass distribution in pregnancy. Gait & Posture. 42(4). 511–517. 22 indexed citations
18.
Santos‐Rocha, Rita, et al.. (2011). ANGULAR KINEMATICS AND JOINT MOMENTS ANALYSIS IN LOWER LIMB AND PELVIS DURING GAIT IN SAGITTAL PLANE IN PREGNANT WOMEN. ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive. 1(1). 1 indexed citations
19.
Santos‐Rocha, Rita, et al.. (2006). Osteogenic index of step exercise depending on choreographic movements, session duration, and stepping rate. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 40(10). 860–866. 18 indexed citations
20.
Santos‐Rocha, Rita, et al.. (2002). GROUND REACTION FORCES OF STEP EXERCISE DEPENDING ON STEP FREQUENCY AND BENCH HEIGHT. ISBS - Conference Proceedings Archive. 1(1). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026