Rita A. Popat
- Neurology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lorene M. NelsonDavid E. KrebsStephen K. Van Den EedenPatrick O. RileyCaroline M. TannerAmethyst LeimpeterSherry M. WrenAnnette Langer‐Gould
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers)Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers)
- Journals
- JAMAJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rita A. Popat
48 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Neurology 343
- Surgery 293
- Epidemiology 217
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 197
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 173
Countries citing papers authored by Rita A. Popat
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita A. Popat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita A. Popat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita A. Popat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita A. Popat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita A. Popat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita A. Popat. The network helps show where Rita A. Popat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rita A. Popat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rita A. Popat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rita A. Popat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rita A. Popat. Rita A. Popat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 166 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Rita A. Popat
Rita A. Popat is a scholar working on Neurology, Internal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (100 citations), Neurology (343 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (166 citations). Rita A. Popat has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lorene M. Nelson, David E. Krebs, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Patrick O. Riley, Caroline M. Tanner, Amethyst Leimpeter, Sherry M. Wren, Annette Langer‐Gould, Paulo Fontoura and Kristin Cobb. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.