Rina Drory

455 citations
8 papers · 60 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Medieval Literature and History
  • Archeology top 10%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies

Papers in

Rina Drory

7 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers

Rina Drory
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Classics 9
  • Archeology 25
  • Religious studies 8
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
  • Philosophy 13
Replace Raymond P. Scheindlin with:
Raymond P. Scheindlin United States
Frederic G. Kenyon
Wilhelm Schmidt‐Biggemann Germany
Nadia Maria El Cheikh
Peter G. Bietenholz Canada
Joseph Roisman Israel
Olga Weijers France
Paul A. S. Harvey Mexico
Judith Olszowy-Schlanger France
Kurt Galling
Rina Drory relative to Raymond P. Scheindlin United States Raymond P. Scheindlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Raymond P. Scheindlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rina Drory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rina Drory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rina Drory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rina Drory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rina Drory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rina Drory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rina Drory. The network helps show where Rina Drory may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Rina Drory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rina Drory Line = papers co-authored together Rina Drory links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Models and Contacts: Arabic Literature and Its Impact on Medieval Jewish Culture
200021
2 20009
3
Three attempts to legitimize fiction in classical Arabic literature
19948
4 19968
5 19936
6 19796
7 20002
8
El contexto hebreo de los contactos entre las culturas judía y árabe: el Oriente, la España musulmana y la España cristiana
19980

About Rina Drory

Rina Drory is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 60 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Islamic Studies and History (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (1 paper), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (9 citations), Archeology (25 citations), Religious studies (8 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations) and Philosophy (13 citations). Rina Drory has collaborated with scholars based in Israel. Frequent co-authors include Yizhar Hirschfeld, Yoram Tsafrir and Gadi Algazi. Their work appears in journals such as Studia Islamica, Poetics Today, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales and Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact