Richard W. Harper
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul J. NestelStephen J. DuffyIan T. MeredithPaul J. JenkinsGishel NewMichael ReardonIan CraigPhilip M. Mottram
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (26 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (19 papers)Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (18 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEndocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Richard W. Harper
125 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.4k
- Surgery 668
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 531
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 461
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 410
Countries citing papers authored by Richard W. Harper
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard W. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard W. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard W. Harper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard W. Harper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard W. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard W. Harper. The network helps show where Richard W. Harper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard W. Harper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard W. Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard W. Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard W. Harper. Richard W. Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Long-term estrogen therapy improves vascular function in male to female transsexuals (see comments) | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 207 |
About Richard W. Harper
Richard W. Harper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Internal Medicine, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (26 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (19 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (461 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (531 citations). Richard W. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Nestel, Stephen J. Duffy, Ian T. Meredith, Paul J. Jenkins, Gishel New, Michael Reardon, Ian Craig, Philip M. Mottram, Aubrey Pitt and John S. Gelman. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.