Richard Stamp

534 total citations
28 papers, 415 citations indexed

About

Richard Stamp is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Stamp has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 415 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Richard Stamp's work include Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (13 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (11 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (10 papers). Richard Stamp is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (13 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (11 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (10 papers). Richard Stamp collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Richard Stamp's co-authors include Janice Kiely, Werner Frammelsberger, Günther Benstetter, Rolf Rascher, Lyndon Smith, Peter Sperber, Gordon Smith, Melvyn Smith, Tony Pipe and Christian Vogt and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Surface Science, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture and Applied Mathematical Modelling.

In The Last Decade

Richard Stamp

27 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Stamp United Kingdom 10 216 163 151 92 80 28 415
Quang-Cherng Hsu Taiwan 13 170 0.8× 268 1.6× 117 0.8× 57 0.6× 40 0.5× 61 506
Gaobo Xiao China 13 463 2.1× 318 2.0× 159 1.1× 67 0.7× 55 0.7× 28 601
Xiaolong Ke China 12 325 1.5× 244 1.5× 92 0.6× 30 0.3× 117 1.5× 27 423
Zexiao Li China 13 328 1.5× 232 1.4× 99 0.7× 74 0.8× 127 1.6× 40 472
Longxiang Li China 12 260 1.2× 149 0.9× 117 0.8× 25 0.3× 111 1.4× 49 385
Xiaobin Yue China 10 179 0.8× 346 2.1× 69 0.5× 30 0.3× 72 0.9× 23 493
Kate Medicus United States 10 229 1.1× 285 1.7× 113 0.7× 37 0.4× 52 0.7× 32 366
Sebastian Bütefisch Germany 12 244 1.1× 175 1.1× 255 1.7× 154 1.7× 71 0.9× 27 512
Chaoliang Guan China 13 493 2.3× 281 1.7× 119 0.8× 47 0.5× 194 2.4× 84 593
R. R. Donaldson United States 10 373 1.7× 392 2.4× 99 0.7× 46 0.5× 79 1.0× 21 491

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Stamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Stamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Stamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Stamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Stamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Stamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Stamp. The network helps show where Richard Stamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Stamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Stamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Stamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Stamp. Richard Stamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Stamp, Richard, et al.. (2012). An online robot trajectory planning and programming support system for industrial use. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 29(1). 71–79. 34 indexed citations
3.
Pipe, Tony, et al.. (2008). A robot manipulator communications and control framework. 846–851. 3 indexed citations
4.
Vogt, Christian, Richard Stamp, Peter Sperber, et al.. (2008). Forces acting between polishing tool and workpiece surface in magnetorheological finishing. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7060. 706006–706006. 15 indexed citations
5.
Stamp, Richard, et al.. (2008). Advanced techniques for computer-controlled polishing. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7060. 70600Q–70600Q. 5 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Gordon, et al.. (2007). Mathematical modelling of influence functions in computer-controlled polishing: Part I. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 32(12). 2888–2906. 38 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Gordon, et al.. (2007). Mathematical modelling of influence functions in computer-controlled polishing: Part II. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 32(12). 2907–2924. 35 indexed citations
8.
Rascher, Rolf, et al.. (2007). Simulation of a complex optical polishing process using a neural network. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 24(1). 32–37. 9 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Gordon, et al.. (2007). Calculation of MRF influence functions. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6671. 66710Y–66710Y. 6 indexed citations
10.
Frammelsberger, Werner, Günther Benstetter, Janice Kiely, & Richard Stamp. (2006). C-AFM-based thickness determination of thin and ultra-thin SiO 2 films by use of different conductive-coated probe tips. Applied Surface Science. 253(7). 3615–3626. 82 indexed citations
11.
Rascher, Rolf, et al.. (2006). Coherences between influence function size, polishing quality, and process time in magnetorheological finishing. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6288. 62880Q–62880Q. 7 indexed citations
12.
Rascher, Rolf, et al.. (2005). New viscosity measurement for magnetorheological polishing fluid. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5869. 58690L–58690L. 2 indexed citations
13.
Rascher, Rolf, et al.. (2005). Comparison of different magnetorheological polishing fluids. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5965. 596528–596528. 8 indexed citations
14.
Frammelsberger, Werner, Günther Benstetter, Janice Kiely, & Richard Stamp. (2005). Thickness determination of thin and ultra-thin SiO2 films by C-AFM IV-spectroscopy. Applied Surface Science. 252(6). 2375–2388. 43 indexed citations
15.
Sperber, Peter, et al.. (2004). Prediction of MRF polishing by classification of the initial error with Zernike polynomials. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5180. 115–115. 4 indexed citations
16.
Frammelsberger, Werner, et al.. (2004). Simplified tunnelling current calculation for MOS structures with ultra-thin oxides for conductive atomic force microscopy investigations. Materials Science and Engineering B. 116(2). 168–174. 13 indexed citations
17.
Frammelsberger, Werner, Günther Benstetter, Richard Stamp, Jason Edwin Stamp, & Janice Kiely. (2003). Combined AFM methods to improve reliability investigations of thin oxides. b13. 151–154. 2 indexed citations
18.
Frammelsberger, Werner, et al.. (2003). Characterization of thin and ultra-thin SiO2 films and SiO2/Si interfaces with combined conducting and topographic atomic force microscopy. Microelectronics Reliability. 43(9-11). 1465–1470. 8 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Melvyn & Richard Stamp. (2000). Automated inspection of textured ceramic tiles. Computers in Industry. 43(1). 73–82. 37 indexed citations
20.
Stamp, Richard, et al.. (1988). Robotic manufacture of sheet‐metal enclosures. Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application. 15(4). 203–205. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026