Richard Pithouse
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 2%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Law top 2%
- Legal Issues in South Africa
Papers in
-
- South African History and Culture 14
- African studies and sociopolitical issues 4
- Political Economy and Marxism 2
-
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 7
- Urban Planning and Governance 2
- Co-authors
- Ashwin Desai (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- South Atlantic Quarterly (2 papers)Politikon (2 papers)Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES (1 paper)Monthly Review (1 paper)City (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaRussia
In The Last Decade
Richard Pithouse
26 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Urban Studies 80
- Law 60
- Sociology and Political Science 171
- Development 11
- Political Science and International Relations 57
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Pithouse
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pithouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pithouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pithouse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Pithouse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pithouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pithouse. The network helps show where Richard Pithouse may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Richard Pithouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 5 | A Progressive Policy without Progressive Politics: Lessons from the failure to implement ‘Breaking New Ground’ | 2009 | 17 |
| 6 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 2 |
About Richard Pithouse
Richard Pithouse is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Law, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (14 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (8 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (7 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (4 papers), African cultural and philosophical studies (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (80 citations), Law (60 citations), Sociology and Political Science (171 citations), Development (11 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (57 citations). Richard Pithouse has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ashwin Desai. Their work appears in journals such as South Atlantic Quarterly, Politikon, Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES, Monthly Review and City.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.