Richard P. Scott
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 2%
- Plant Science
- Cancer Research
- Pollution top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Kim A. AndersonGlenn WilsonCarey E. DonaldHolly M. DixonSteven G. O’ConnellJulie B. HerbstmanPeter D. HoffmanDiana Rohlman
- Topics
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (14 papers)Air Quality and Health Impacts (11 papers)Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (10 papers)
- Journals
- Environmental Science & TechnologyThe Science of The Total EnvironmentEnvironmental Pollution
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Richard P. Scott
30 papers receiving 779 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 584
- Plant Science 147
- Cancer Research 131
- Pollution 88
- Sociology and Political Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by Richard P. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard P. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard P. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard P. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard P. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard P. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard P. Scott. The network helps show where Richard P. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard P. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard P. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard P. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard P. Scott. Richard P. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 102 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Richard P. Scott
Richard P. Scott is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research and Plant Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (14 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (11 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (584 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (17 citations) and Cancer Research (131 citations). Richard P. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Kim A. Anderson, Glenn Wilson, Carey E. Donald, Holly M. Dixon, Steven G. O’Connell, Julie B. Herbstman, Peter D. Hoffman, Diana Rohlman, Laurel Kincl and Lane G. Tidwell. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Environmental Pollution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.