Richard P. Halley‐Stott
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Genetics
- Plant Science
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- J. B. GurdonVincent PasqueJérôme JullienKei MiyamotoJosé SilvaAliaksandra RadzisheuskayaMagdalena Zernicka‐GoetzEdward P. Rybicki
- Topics
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (11 papers)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard P. Halley‐Stott
17 papers receiving 980 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 822
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 149
- Genetics 127
- Plant Science 121
- Immunology 112
Countries citing papers authored by Richard P. Halley‐Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard P. Halley‐Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard P. Halley‐Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard P. Halley‐Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard P. Halley‐Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard P. Halley‐Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard P. Halley‐Stott. The network helps show where Richard P. Halley‐Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard P. Halley‐Stott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard P. Halley‐Stott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard P. Halley‐Stott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard P. Halley‐Stott. Richard P. Halley‐Stott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 313 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 76 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 79 | |
| 16 | 106 | |
| 17 | 21 |
About Richard P. Halley‐Stott
Richard P. Halley‐Stott is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 996 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (11 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (822 citations), Biotechnology (89 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (36 citations). Richard P. Halley‐Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. B. Gurdon, Vincent Pasque, Jérôme Jullien, Kei Miyamoto, José Silva, Aliaksandra Radzisheuskaya, Magdalena Zernicka‐Goetz, Edward P. Rybicki, Remco Loos and Maria A. Christophorou. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.