Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
19858.4k citationsPierre Bourdıeu, Richard Nice et al.profile →
Sociology in Question
1995918 citationsChristian Ghasarian, Pierre Bourdıeu et al.Anthropological Quarterlyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Nice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Nice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Nice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Nice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Nice. The network helps show where Richard Nice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Nice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Nice.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Nice based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Nice. Richard Nice is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bourdıeu, Pierre, Gisèle Sapiro, Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson, Richard Nice, & Loïc Wacquant. (2010). Sociology is a Martial Art: Political Writings by Pierre Bourdieu. Medical Entomology and Zoology.29 indexed citations
2.
Bourdıeu, Pierre & Richard Nice. (2007). The Bachelors' Ball: The Crisis of Peasant Society in Béarn. Medical Entomology and Zoology.42 indexed citations
3.
Bourdıeu, Pierre & Richard Nice. (2004). Sketch for a Self-Analysis. Medical Entomology and Zoology.96 indexed citations
4.
Bourdıeu, Pierre, et al.. (2002). Masculine Domination. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 31(4). 407–407.6 indexed citations
Zolberg, Vera L., Pierre Bourdıeu, & Richard Nice. (1986). Taste as a Social Weapon. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 15(4). 511–511.9 indexed citations
13.
Bourdıeu, Pierre & Richard Nice. (1980). The aristocracy of culture. Media Culture & Society. 2(3). 225–254.92 indexed citations
Lyons, Andrew P., Pierre Bourdıeu, & Richard Nice. (1980). Outline of a Theory of Practice. ASA Review of Books. 6. 232–232.613 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Gilsenan, Michaël, Pierre Bourdıeu, & Richard Nice. (1979). Algeria 1960...Essays.. Man. 14(4). 759–759.7 indexed citations
17.
Brandfonbrener, Martin, Douglas R. Gracey, & Richard Nice. (1969). Coronary pressure-blood flow relations. The American Journal of Cardiology. 23(3). 417–423.5 indexed citations
Rouček, Joseph S. & Richard Nice. (1958). Crime and Insanity. The American Catholic Sociological Review. 19(4). 346–346.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.