Richard Miles
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Robert K. S. WongRoger D. TraubKatalin TóthTamás F. FreundIvan CohenAttila I. GulyásMichel BaulacStéphane Clémenceau
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (82 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (40 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Richard Miles
97 papers receiving 10.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 8.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.3k
- Molecular Biology 3.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
- Neurology 811
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Miles
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Miles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Miles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Miles. The network helps show where Richard Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Miles. Richard Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 95 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | 450 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 197 | |
| 17 | Differences between Somatic and Dendritic Inhibition in the Hippocampusbreakdown → | 765 |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Richard Miles
Richard Miles is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 97 papers that have together received 11.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (82 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (40 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (8.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.3k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (587 citations). Richard Miles has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Robert K. S. Wong, Roger D. Traub, Katalin Tóth, Tamás F. Freund, Ivan Cohen, Attila I. Gulyás, Michel Baulac, Stéphane Clémenceau, Gilles Huberfeld and Vincent Navarro. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.