Richard M. Devon

1.6k citations
25 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Richard M. Devon

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Richard M. Devon
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Developmental Neuroscience 273
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 705
  • Neurology 174
  • Biological Psychiatry 36
  • Neurology 192
Replace Diana Casper with:
Diana Casper United States
Tajrena Alexi United States
Irina Semkova Germany
Alain Privat France
Esperanza R. Matarredona Spain
Hiroshi Usui Japan
Osamu Yasuhara Japan
Marie Simard United States
Stephan Verleysdonk Germany
P. Elyse Schauwecker United States
Richard M. Devon relative to Diana Casper United States Diana Casper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Diana Casper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Devon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Devon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Devon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Devon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Devon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Devon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Devon. The network helps show where Richard M. Devon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard M. Devon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard M. Devon Line = papers co-authored together Richard M. Devon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998394
2 2007160
3 1984142
4 200997
5 197880
6 200846
7 199740
8 199537
9 199535
10 200028
11 199423
12 198122
13 199019
14 199019
15 199119
16 197915
17 198314
18 198912
19 198810
20 19809

About Richard M. Devon

Richard M. Devon is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (2 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (273 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (705 citations), Neurology (174 citations), Biological Psychiatry (36 citations) and Neurology (192 citations). Richard M. Devon has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David Jones, B. H. J. Juurlink, S. Fedoroff, Abigail S. Hackam, Diane Martindale, Parsa Kazemi‐Esfarjani, Krista McCutcheon, Lisa Ellerby, Frank Tufaro and Seung Up Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Glia, Brain Research, Cell and Tissue Research, Developmental Brain Research and Nature Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact