Richard L. Cooper
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian J. ConstableRobert H. EikelboomWilliam H. MorganDavid G. BealeStephen J. CringleLisa DavidsonAlex W. HewittDao‐Yi Yu
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (24 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of OphthalmologyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard L. Cooper
48 papers receiving 640 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Ophthalmology 446
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 325
- Molecular Biology 91
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 73
- Emergency Medical Services 55
Countries citing papers authored by Richard L. Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard L. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard L. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard L. Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard L. Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard L. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard L. Cooper. The network helps show where Richard L. Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard L. Cooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard L. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard L. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard L. Cooper. Richard L. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | Pressure gradients across the optic disk | 5 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Richard L. Cooper
Richard L. Cooper is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (24 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (446 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (325 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (55 citations). Richard L. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian J. Constable, Robert H. Eikelboom, William H. Morgan, David G. Beale, Stephen J. Cringle, Lisa Davidson, Alex W. Hewitt, Dao‐Yi Yu, Emil Fischer and James H. Abernathy. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Anaesthesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.