Richard King
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- O. L. ChapmanJohn A. BakerDavid C. HeinsSusan A. FosterD. C. PeasleeJ. F. PerkinsDonald A. WhitingMichael A. Bell
- Topics
- Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Richard King
32 papers receiving 731 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Sociology and Political Science 182
- Organic Chemistry 164
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 124
- Philosophy 105
- Ecology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Richard King
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard King. The network helps show where Richard King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard King. Richard King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Early Advaita Vedānta and Buddhism: the Mahāyāna context of the Gauḍapādīya-kārikā | 5 |
| 8 | Model-based nuclear power plant monitoring and fault detection: Theoretical foundations | 55 |
| 9 | Nesting biology and foraging patterns of the solitary bee Melissodes rustica (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in northwest Arkansas | 18 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 196 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Richard King
Richard King is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 39 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (73 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (124 citations) and Philosophy (105 citations). Richard King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include O. L. Chapman, John A. Baker, David C. Heins, Susan A. Foster, D. C. Peaslee, J. F. Perkins, Donald A. Whiting, Michael A. Bell, R.M. Singer and Stephan Wegerich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Analytical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.