Richard K. Phipps
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Molecular Medicine top 0.5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Microbiology top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael GivskovNiels HøibyThomas BjarnsholtPeter Østrup JensenThomas Ostenfeld LarsenKlaus Kirketerp‐MøllerMette E. SkindersoeKaren A. Krogfelt
- Topics
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (12 papers)Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (11 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard K. Phipps
30 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Molecular Medicine 629
- Rehabilitation 487
- Microbiology 439
- Plant Science 439
Countries citing papers authored by Richard K. Phipps
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard K. Phipps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard K. Phipps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard K. Phipps more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard K. Phipps
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard K. Phipps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard K. Phipps. The network helps show where Richard K. Phipps may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard K. Phipps
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard K. Phipps. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard K. Phipps based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard K. Phipps. Richard K. Phipps is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 160 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 204 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 171 | |
| 8 | 151 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 149 | |
| 13 | Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesisbreakdown → | 706 |
| 14 | 132 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Richard K. Phipps
Richard K. Phipps is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology and Endocrinology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (12 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (11 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (629 citations), Rehabilitation (487 citations) and Microbiology (439 citations). Richard K. Phipps has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Givskov, Niels Høiby, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Peter Østrup Jensen, Thomas Ostenfeld Larsen, Klaus Kirketerp‐Møller, Mette E. Skindersoe, Karen A. Krogfelt, Morten Alhede and Kristian Fog Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.