Richard K. Imes

571 citations
20 papers · 278 indexed · h-index 9

Richard K. Imes

20 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Richard K. Imes
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Neurology 177
  • Ophthalmology 82
  • Genetics 59
  • Epidemiology 127
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 33
Replace Bülent Boyar with:
Bülent Boyar Türkiye
Rezzan Tunçay Türkiye
Tetsuo Wakao Japan
R. S. Hooper Australia
Timothy D. Matthews United Kingdom
M. A. Jeffree United Kingdom
R. Serramito-García Spain
Esin Fırat Türkiye
Michael D. du Trevou South Africa
D G R Jayamanne United Kingdom
Richard K. Imes relative to Bülent Boyar Türkiye Bülent Boyar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Bülent Boyar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard K. Imes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard K. Imes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard K. Imes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard K. Imes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard K. Imes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard K. Imes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard K. Imes. The network helps show where Richard K. Imes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Richard K. Imes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard K. Imes Line = papers co-authored together Richard K. Imes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202011
2 20203
3 20153
4
Autosomal Dominant Bilateral Combined Hamartoma of the Retina and Retinal Pigment Epithelium or a New Familial Optic Nerve Dysgenesis
20101
5
Presumed bilateral lateral geniculate nuclei ischemia.
20062
6 20039
7 200115
8 199328
9 199145
10
Exercise-induced transient visual events in young healthy adults.
19898
11 19883
12 19862
13 198649
14 198659
15 19855
16 198512
17 19843
18
Ophthalmoplegic migraine with proximal posterior cerebral artery vascular anomaly.
198411
19
Optic nerve meningioma with enophthalmos.
19844
20 19785

About Richard K. Imes

Richard K. Imes is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (4 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (3 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (177 citations), Ophthalmology (82 citations) and Genetics (59 citations). Richard K. Imes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include William F. Hoyt, William A. Fletcher, Mário Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro, James A. Garrity, Chaim M. Bell, David C. Herman, Nils Olsen, Wayne E. Fung, H. Richard McDonald and Sara J. Haug. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of neurosurgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026