Richard Hodder‐Williams
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christopher ClaphamPaul Whiteley
- Topics
- African studies and sociopolitical issues (12 papers)African history and culture studies (10 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Political ScienceThe International Journal of African Historical StudiesPolitical Studies
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Hodder‐Williams
32 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- Anthropology 62
- Political Science and International Relations 60
- Education 35
- Law 24
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hodder‐Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hodder‐Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hodder‐Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hodder‐Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hodder‐Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hodder‐Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hodder‐Williams. The network helps show where Richard Hodder‐Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Hodder‐Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Hodder‐Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Hodder‐Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Hodder‐Williams. Richard Hodder‐Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences | 63 |
| 3 | Africa and the Study of Politics | 2 |
| 4 | Judges and politics in the contemporary age | 4 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | A Small Town in Crisis: Marandellas, Zimbabwe | 2 |
| 11 | Kenya after Kenyatta | 3 |
| 12 | The Rhodesian referendum of October 1922: some further reflections | 2 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Afrikaners in Rhodesia: A Partial Portrait | 8 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | The British South Africa company in Marandellas: some extra-institutional constraints on government | 1 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Richard Hodder‐Williams
Richard Hodder‐Williams is a scholar working on Anthropology, Law and Development, having authored 37 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African studies and sociopolitical issues (12 papers), African history and culture studies (10 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (62 citations), Development (15 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (128 citations). Richard Hodder‐Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Clapham and Paul Whiteley. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, The International Journal of African Historical Studies and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.