Hennie Kotzé
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Law top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Legal Issues in South Africa (7 papers)Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers)African cultural and philosophical studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaSpain
In The Last Decade
Hennie Kotzé
36 papers receiving 171 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Sociology and Political Science 174
- Political Science and International Relations 72
- Education 45
- Law 36
- Economics and Econometrics 17
Countries citing papers authored by Hennie Kotzé
This map shows the geographic impact of Hennie Kotzé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hennie Kotzé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hennie Kotzé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hennie Kotzé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hennie Kotzé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hennie Kotzé. The network helps show where Hennie Kotzé may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hennie Kotzé
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hennie Kotzé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hennie Kotzé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hennie Kotzé. Hennie Kotzé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Social Norms in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis | 1 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Work value change in South Africa between 1995 and 2001 : race, gender and occupations compared | 3 |
| 9 | Mass and Elite Attitudes Towards the Criminal Justice System in South Africa: How Congruent? | 4 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Backbenchers' backgrounds and the perceptions in the South African Parliament. | 0 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Mass media and the matriculant mind: a case study of political socialisation in South Africa | 2 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Hennie Kotzé
Hennie Kotzé is a scholar working on Law, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Issues in South Africa (7 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers) and African cultural and philosophical studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (174 citations), Law (36 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (72 citations). Hennie Kotzé has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Deon Geldenhuys, Amanda Gouws, Susan Booysen, Amanda Gouws, Robert Mattes and Jo‐Ansie van Wyk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Conflict Resolution, Party Politics and International Migration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.