Richard Hampson

837 citations
18 papers · 709 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Hampson

18 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Richard Hampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 309
  • Cancer Research 195
  • Molecular Biology 470
  • Oncology 176
  • Genetics 37
Replace Anna Mizutani with:
Anna Mizutani Japan
Hans Hombauer United States
Filomena Mazzei Italy
Anne Bieth France
Karen H. Almeida United States
Sandy Chevrier France
Miaw-Sheue Tsai United States
Daniel L. Smith United States
Maša Alečković United States
Makoto Iimori Japan
Richard Hampson relative to Anna Mizutani Japan Anna Mizutani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Anna Mizutani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Hampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Hampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Hampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Hampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Hampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Hampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Hampson. The network helps show where Richard Hampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Hampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Hampson Line = papers co-authored together Richard Hampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
DNA mismatch binding defects, DNA damage tolerance, and mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines.
1995151
2 2001129
3 1996109
4
Genomic instability and tolerance to alkylating agents.
199687
5
N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-cyclohexyl-N-nitrosourea sensitivity in mismatch repair-defective human cells.
199861
6 199753
7 200831
8 201629
9 199713
10 201912
11 199711
12 19979
13 20017
14 20033
15 20221
16 20101
17 19971
18 20161

About Richard Hampson

Richard Hampson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (1 paper), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (1 paper), Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (1 paper) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (309 citations), Cancer Research (195 citations), Molecular Biology (470 citations), Oncology (176 citations) and Genetics (37 citations). Richard Hampson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter Karran, P Branch, Simon M. Hughes, Walter F. Bodmer, Gabriele Aquilina, Oliver Coutelle, Loukas Kaklamanis, David Bicknell, Peter Rigby and Simone Martinelli. Their work appears in journals such as Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, BMC Genomics, Current Biology and Mutation Research/DNA Repair.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact