Richard H. Zander

2.1k citations
139 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 17

Richard H. Zander

125 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Richard H. Zander
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
  • Plant Science 1.2k
  • Ecology 214
  • Paleontology 51
  • Ecological Modeling 30
Replace Kjell Ivar Flatberg with:
Kjell Ivar Flatberg Norway
David Glenny New Zealand
Alfons Schäfer‐Verwimp Germany
Michael Stech Netherlands
Michael S. Ignatov Russia
Aaron J. Sharp United States
Santiago Castroviejo Spain
M. F. V. Corley Portugal
Rafael Jordana Spain
Benjamin Laenen Sweden
Richard H. Zander relative to Kjell Ivar Flatberg Norway Kjell Ivar Flatberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Kjell Ivar Flatberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard H. Zander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard H. Zander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard H. Zander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard H. Zander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard H. Zander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard H. Zander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard H. Zander. The network helps show where Richard H. Zander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard H. Zander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard H. Zander Line = papers co-authored together Richard H. Zander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20230
4 20233
5 20231
6 20213
7 20193
8 201611
9
Sex propheromone of the pine tree lappet moth Dendrolimus pini and its use in attractant-based monitoring system.
20104
10
Conservation of evolutionary diversity in Pottiaceae (Musci)
20092
11 20078
12 200629
13 20011
14 200112
15 20011
16 199644
17 19808
18 19801
19 197945
20 197253

About Richard H. Zander

Richard H. Zander is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Paleontology, having authored 139 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (97 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (95 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (75 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (10 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (9 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (8 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations), Plant Science (1.2k citations) and Ecology (214 citations). Richard H. Zander has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Dale H. Vitt, Patricia M. Eckel, William D. Reese, Terry A. Hedderson, Ryszard Ochyra, H. Ziegler, W. Stichler, Philip W. Rundel, Wolfgang Weber and Claudio Delgadillo M.. Their work appears in journals such as The Bryologist, Journal of Bryology, Taxon, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Systematic Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026