Richard Greene
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Classics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
- Topics
- Digital Games and Media (2 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard Greene
18 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Literature and Literary Theory 36
- History 32
- Classics 24
- Sociology and Political Science 18
- Philosophy 14
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Greene
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Greene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Greene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Greene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Greene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Greene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Greene. The network helps show where Richard Greene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Greene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Greene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Greene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Greene. Richard Greene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Managing the next crisis: twelve principles for dealing with viral uncertainty | 2 |
| 4 | Edith Sitwell: Avant garde poet, English genius | 3 |
| 5 | Zombies, vampires, and philosophy : new life for the undead | 4 |
| 6 | Quentin Tarantino and Philosophy: How to Philosophize with a Pair of Pliers and a Blowtorch | 0 |
| 7 | The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless | 10 |
| 8 | The Undead and Philosophy | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | The man behind the magic : the story of Walt Disney | 3 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | A Selection of English Carols | 0 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Graham Greene: A Life in Letters | 4 |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Richard Greene
Richard Greene is a scholar working on Music, Literature and Literary Theory and Public Administration, having authored 30 papers that have together received 109 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (24 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (36 citations) and History (32 citations). Richard Greene has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rossell Hope Robbins, Donna Landry, Katherine Barrett, Graham Greene, Donald F. Kettl and P. G. Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, The Modern Language Review and International Journal of Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.