Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A meta-analysis of the correlates of role conflict and ambiguity.
1983554 citationsCynthia D. Fisher, Richard GitelsonJournal of Applied Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Gitelson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Gitelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Gitelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Gitelson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Gitelson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Gitelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Gitelson. The network helps show where Richard Gitelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Gitelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Gitelson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Gitelson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Gitelson. Richard Gitelson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gitelson, Richard, et al.. (2008). The Impact of Senior Centers on Participants in Congregate Meal Programs. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 26(3).7 indexed citations
Gitelson, Richard. (1998). Determining the benefactors of tourism: a case study of a small rural Pennsylvania community.. Tourism Analysis. 3(3). 209–214.2 indexed citations
6.
Kerstetter, Deborah, et al.. (1996). The influence of a spouse or partner in travel decision-making.. ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University). 18(2). 51–55.4 indexed citations
Moore, Roger L., Alan R. Graefe, & Richard Gitelson. (1994). Living near greenways: neighboring landowners' experiences with and attitudes toward rail-trails.. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 12(1). 79–93.13 indexed citations
9.
Moore, Roger L., Richard Gitelson, & Alan R. Graefe. (1994). The Economic Impact of Rail-Trails. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 12(2). 63–72.7 indexed citations
Gitelson, Richard, et al.. (1986). The Effects of Federal Cutbacks on Local Park and Recreation Systems in North Carolina: A Case Study. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 4(2).1 indexed citations
16.
Gitelson, Richard. (1985). The 1984 SPRE survey: park and recreation enrollment stabilizes.. Parks & recreation. 20(4). 64–69.1 indexed citations
17.
Gitelson, Richard, et al.. (1983). The 1982 SPRE Survey. The Accelerating Decline of Enrollment.. Parks & recreation. 18(8). 59–65.5 indexed citations
18.
Fisher, Cynthia D. & Richard Gitelson. (1983). A meta-analysis of the correlates of role conflict and ambiguity.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 68(2). 320–333.554 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.