Richard G. Greenleaf
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Health top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Arthur J. LurigioJamie L. FlexonLonn Lanza‐KaduceWarren FriedmanWesley G. SkoganYung‐Lien LaiLing RenLisa Stolzenberg
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (17 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (15 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Richard G. Greenleaf
19 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Sociology and Political Science 315
- Political Science and International Relations 269
- Health 88
- Gender Studies 52
- Clinical Psychology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Greenleaf
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Greenleaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Greenleaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Greenleaf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Greenleaf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Greenleaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Greenleaf. The network helps show where Richard G. Greenleaf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Greenleaf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Greenleaf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Greenleaf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Greenleaf. Richard G. Greenleaf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | Race-Based Decisions: Traffic Citations and Municipal Court Dispositions | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 97 | |
| 11 | The Effects of Race on Relationships with the Police: A Survey of African American and Latino Youths in Chicago | 47 |
| 12 | Antecedents to Gang Membership: Attachments, Beliefs, and Street Encounters with the Police | 6 |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Richard G. Greenleaf
Richard G. Greenleaf is a scholar working on Health, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (17 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (15 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (269 citations), Health (88 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (315 citations). Richard G. Greenleaf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Arthur J. Lurigio, Jamie L. Flexon, Lonn Lanza‐Kaduce, Warren Friedman, Wesley G. Skogan, Yung‐Lien Lai, Ling Ren, Lisa Stolzenberg, Shanhe Jiang and Stewart J. D’Alessio. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency and Justice Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.