Richard Forsyth

27 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Richard Forsyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Artificial Intelligence 119
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
  • Transportation 33
  • Information Systems 31
Replace Harpreet Singh with:
Harpreet Singh India
Shannon C. Roberts United States
Michael K. Martin United States
Xiaohua Sun China
Jamie O’Brien United States
Sangyeon Kim South Korea
Veysi İşler Türkiye
Xiaohui Luo China
Sofia Fernandes Portugal
Darren Shannon Ireland
Richard Forsyth relative to Harpreet Singh India Harpreet Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
Harpreet Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Forsyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Forsyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Forsyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Forsyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Forsyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Forsyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Forsyth. The network helps show where Richard Forsyth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Forsyth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Forsyth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Forsyth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Forsyth. Richard Forsyth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 51
2 15
3 2
4 10
5
Towards the compilation of a corpus of assessed student writing: an account of work in progress
10
6 25
7 32
8 22
9 7
10 16
11
Neural learning algorithms: some empirical trials
6
12
The expert systems phenomenon
8
13
From data to knowledge
2
14 1
15
The evolution of intelligence
4
16
Machine Learning: Principles and techniques
9
17 2
18
The hitch-hiker's guide to artificial intelligence
9
19 0
20
Pascal at Work and Play: An Introduction to Computer Programming in Pascal
1

About Richard Forsyth

Richard Forsyth is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Linguistics and Language, having authored 30 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (5 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (69 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (22 citations) and Transportation (33 citations). Richard Forsyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Roy Rada, Richard L. Wright, David D. Clarke, David Clarke, Brigitte Nerlich, Peter Garrard, David D. Clarke, An‐Chang Shi, Jaan Noolandi and Li Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Accident Analysis & Prevention and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026