Richard Flower
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 4
- Classics 3
- Byzantine Studies and History 3
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Co-authors
- Mary Whitby (1 shared paper)Robert Cohn (1 shared paper)K. K. Ramakrishnan (1 shared paper)Robert Muth (1 shared paper)Harish Patil (1 shared paper)Christopher Kelly (2 shared papers)Peter Van Nuffelen (1 shared paper)Chi-Keung Luk (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Roman Studies (1 paper)Journal of late antiquity (1 paper)Acta Astronautica (1 paper)The Classical Quarterly (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Flower
9 papers receiving 45 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Classics 26
- Anthropology 20
- Hardware and Architecture 13
- History 19
- Archeology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Flower
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Flower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Flower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Flower. The network helps show where Richard Flower may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Richard Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 2 | Kernel Optimizations and Prefetch with the Spike Executable Optimizer | 2001 | 11 |
| 3 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 4 | High-performance TCP/IP and UDP/IP networking in DEC OSF/1 for Alpha AXP | 1993 | 6 |
| 5 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 9 | Alternatives to the classical past in late antiquity | 2010 | 1 |
| 10 | 2018 | 0 |
About Richard Flower
Richard Flower is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Hardware and Architecture, Archeology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 54 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (1 paper) and Spacecraft Design and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (26 citations), Anthropology (20 citations), Hardware and Architecture (13 citations), History (19 citations) and Archeology (8 citations). Richard Flower has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary Whitby, Robert Cohn, K. K. Ramakrishnan, Robert Muth, Harish Patil, Christopher Kelly, Peter Van Nuffelen, Chi-Keung Luk and P. Geoffrey Lowney. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Roman Studies, Journal of late antiquity, Acta Astronautica, The Classical Quarterly and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.