Mary Whitby
- Anthropology top 5%
- Archeology top 2%
- Classics top 1%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Michael WhitbyPhilip HardieJ. C. BrambleJoyce E. SalisburyPhilip LoweChristopher KellyPeter Van NuffelenL.H.G. Slangen
- Topics
- Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsAnthropologyArcheology
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mary Whitby
21 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Anthropology 150
- Archeology 104
- Classics 100
- History 51
- Sociology and Political Science 32
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Whitby
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Whitby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Whitby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Whitby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Whitby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Whitby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Whitby. The network helps show where Mary Whitby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Whitby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Whitby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Whitby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Whitby. Mary Whitby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Persica. Greek Writing about Persia in the Fourth Century BC | 5 |
| 3 | The Evolution of the Late Antique World | 8 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Appropriate frameworks for studying the relationship between agriculture and the environment: a question of balance. | 1 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Comparative evaluation of environmental policies: ESAs in a policy context | 7 |
| 15 | The political and economic roots of environmental policy in agriculture. | 14 |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble | 95 |
| 18 | The History of Theophylact Simocatta : an English translation with introduction and notes | 13 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Mary Whitby
Mary Whitby is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (100 citations), Anthropology (150 citations) and Archeology (104 citations). Mary Whitby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Whitby, Philip Hardie, J. C. Bramble, Joyce E. Salisbury, Philip Lowe, Christopher Kelly, Peter Van Nuffelen, L.H.G. Slangen, William D. Bloomer and Alex Dubgaard. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The Journal of Roman Studies and The Journal of Hellenic Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.