Richard E. Smith

44.4k total citations
104 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Richard E. Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard E. Smith has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 11 papers in Molecular Biology and 11 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Richard E. Smith's work include Robot Manipulation and Learning (7 papers), Information and Cyber Security (6 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers). Richard E. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Robot Manipulation and Learning (7 papers), Information and Cyber Security (6 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers). Richard E. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Richard E. Smith's co-authors include Bruce E. Jaffe, Raymond J. Bergeron, Jeffrey W. Gartner, T. J. Conomos, Amy C. Foxgrover, James S. McManis, William R. Weimar, Maria Gini, Jan Wiegand and P. Suresh C. Rao and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Bioinformatics and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Richard E. Smith

99 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Richard E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Molecular Biology 430
  • Ecology 383
  • Earth-Surface Processes 239
  • Oceanography 196
  • Plant Science 172
Replace John F. Elder with:
John F. Elder United States
Li Wan China
Guoqing Li China
Gary Sullivan United States
Hao Zhang China
Ying Liu China
Peng Peng China
Yongchao Liu China
Dan Li China
John F. Elder United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard E. Smith
Richard E. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard E. Smith
Richard E. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Smith. The network helps show where Richard E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard E. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard E. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard E. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard E. Smith. Richard E. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 15
2 14
3
The Biology and Conservation of Gorgonian-Associated Pygmy Seahorses
4
4 41
5 4
6 25
7 15
8 7
9 14
10 69
11
Bottom boundary layer in south San Francisco Bay, California
4
12 1
13 51
14
The root systems of three species of Protea shrubs in the Jonkershoek Valley, Cape Province.
1
15 37
16 2
17 16
18 4
19 54
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026