Richard E. Kreh
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- John R. SeilerJames A. BurgerPeter P. FeretJohn W. GroningerStephen H. SchoenholtzT. R. FoxShepard M. ZedakerJ. L. Torbert
- Topics
- Seedling growth and survival studies (19 papers)Forest ecology and management (15 papers)Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Richard E. Kreh
29 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 405
- Global and Planetary Change 242
- Plant Science 172
- Soil Science 109
- Ecology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Kreh
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Kreh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Kreh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Kreh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Kreh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Kreh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Kreh. The network helps show where Richard E. Kreh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard E. Kreh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard E. Kreh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard E. Kreh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard E. Kreh. Richard E. Kreh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Response of Planted Royal Paulownia to Weed Control Treatments After Coppice | 1 |
| 3 | THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOILS AND FOLIAR NUTRITION FOR PLANTED ROYAL PAULOWNIA | 2 |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 89 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | The development of five-year-old mixed upland hardwood-pine stands | 4 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | Tires and tracks: how they compare in the forest | 10 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Richard E. Kreh
Richard E. Kreh is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Soil Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seedling growth and survival studies (19 papers), Forest ecology and management (15 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (405 citations), Soil Science (109 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (242 citations). Richard E. Kreh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John R. Seiler, James A. Burger, Peter P. Feret, John W. Groninger, Stephen H. Schoenholtz, T. R. Fox, Shepard M. Zedaker, J. L. Torbert, D. W. Smith and James E. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, Plant and Soil and Forest Ecology and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.