Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
19852.3k citationsGershon Feder, Richard E. Just et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Just
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Just's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Just with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Just more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Just. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Just. The network helps show where Richard E. Just may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard E. Just
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard E. Just.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard E. Just based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard E. Just. Richard E. Just is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Just, Richard E. & Darrell L. Hueth. (2016). Welfare Measures in a Multimarket Framework. American Economic Review. 69(5). 947–954.3 indexed citations
3.
Just, Richard E., et al.. (2016). Price Controls and Optimal Export Policies under Alternative Market Structures. American Economic Review. 69(4). 706–714.5 indexed citations
4.
Irwin, Scott H., et al.. (2010). Preface to the Centennial Issue. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 92(2). 297–299.1 indexed citations
Just, Richard E.. (2006). Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).78 indexed citations
Just, Richard E. & Quinn Weninger. (1999). Are Crop Yields Normally Distributed?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 81(2). 287–304.174 indexed citations
Ghura, Dhaneshwar & Richard E. Just. (1992). Education, Infrastructure and Instability in East African Agriculture: Implications for Structural Adjustment Programs. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(1). 85–105.8 indexed citations
12.
Just, Richard E. & Nancy E. Bockstael. (1991). COMMODITY AND RESOURCE POLICIES IN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Just, Richard E.. (1982). Applied welfare economics and public policy / Richard E. Just, Darell L. Hueth, Andrew Schmitz. 1982(1982). 1–99.2 indexed citations
16.
Chern, Wen S. & Richard E. Just. (1980). Generalized model for fuel choices with application to the paper industry. 980137.3 indexed citations
Rausser, Gordon C. & Richard E. Just. (1979). Agricultural commodity price forecasting accuracy: futures markets versus commercial econometric models. eScholarship (California Digital Library).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.