Countries citing papers authored by Richard Coopey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Coopey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Coopey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Coopey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Coopey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Coopey. The network helps show where Richard Coopey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Coopey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Coopey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Coopey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Coopey. Richard Coopey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Tvedt, Terje & Richard Coopey. (2010). Rivers and Society : From Early Civilizations to Modern Times. I.B.Tauris eBooks.4 indexed citations
2.
Coopey, Richard. (2010). A River Does Indeed Run Through It: Angling and Society In Britain Since 1800. 59–82.1 indexed citations
3.
Coopey, Richard & Terje Tvedt. (2010). A Water Systems Perspective on History.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.