Richard Clayton

1.3k citations
53 papers · 917 indexed · h-index 17

Richard Clayton

49 papers receiving 865 citations

Peers

Richard Clayton
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Reproductive Medicine 477
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 367
  • Aquatic Science 138
  • Periodontics 70
  • Orthodontics 52
Replace P. A. Flett with:
P. A. Flett Canada
Julia Kopeika United Kingdom
P.A. Pugh New Zealand
Jeremy Twigg United Kingdom
Pratap B. Singh India
S. Stray‐Pedersen Norway
Qin Xu China
Yael Gonen Israel
Byung Chul Jee South Korea
Richard Clayton relative to P. A. Flett Canada P. A. Flett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×52×
P. A. Flett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Clayton. The network helps show where Richard Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Clayton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Clayton Line = papers co-authored together Richard Clayton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 202021
3 20151
4 201420
5 201341
6 20106
7
Managing Iowa Fisheries: Cage Fish Culture
20091
8 200923
9 200910
10 200621
11 200554
12 20046
13 20044
14
Dietary Available Phosphorus Needs of High Lean Pigs Fed from 9 to 119 kg Body Weight
20016
15 2000243
16 199935
17 199922
18 19995
19 19995
20 198655

About Richard Clayton

Richard Clayton is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Reproductive Medicine, Physiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 53 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (14 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (477 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (367 citations), Aquatic Science (138 citations), Periodontics (70 citations) and Orthodontics (52 citations). Richard Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Ray Garry, Jeremy Hawe, Robert C. Summerfelt, John J. Hefferren, D.S. Harper, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Joseph E. Morris, Anthony Howell and Jed Hawe. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Human Genetics, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026