Rhona J. McVey
- Molecular Biology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Oncology
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Henry C KitchenerEmma J. CrosbieJames M. BoltonVanitha N. SivalingamSarah KitsonM. Nickkho‐AmiryGordon C. JaysonAndrew R. Clamp
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers)Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Rhona J. McVey
32 papers receiving 958 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Molecular Biology 350
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 289
- Reproductive Medicine 258
- Oncology 220
- Cancer Research 210
Countries citing papers authored by Rhona J. McVey
This map shows the geographic impact of Rhona J. McVey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhona J. McVey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhona J. McVey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rhona J. McVey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhona J. McVey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhona J. McVey. The network helps show where Rhona J. McVey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhona J. McVey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhona J. McVey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhona J. McVey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhona J. McVey. Rhona J. McVey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 72 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 71 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | Immunological and clinical responses in women with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia vaccinated with a vaccinia virus encoding human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoproteins. | 140 |
| 20 | 13 |
About Rhona J. McVey
Rhona J. McVey is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Cancer Research, having authored 32 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (289 citations), Reproductive Medicine (258 citations) and Cancer Research (210 citations). Rhona J. McVey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry C Kitchener, Emma J. Crosbie, James M. Bolton, Vanitha N. Sivalingam, Sarah Kitson, M. Nickkho‐Amiry, Gordon C. Jayson, Andrew R. Clamp, Alison Backen and Andrew G. Renehan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.