Richard Cheng
About
In The Last Decade
Richard Cheng
11 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Biomedical Engineering 274
- Automotive Engineering 133
- Molecular Biology 100
- Rehabilitation 100
- Biomaterials 69
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Cheng. The network helps show where Richard Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Cheng. Richard Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 202 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.