Richard Calver

794 total citations
18 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

Richard Calver is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Calver has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Epidemiology, 12 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Richard Calver's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Richard Calver is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Richard Calver collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malaysia. Richard Calver's co-authors include Michael J. Cox, Hema Radhakrishnan, Daniel J. O’Leary, David B. Elliott, George Smith, Leon F. Garner, Peter M. Allen, Shahina Pardhan, Ebi Peter Osuobeni and Holly Price and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

In The Last Decade

Richard Calver

18 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Calver United Kingdom 12 525 446 349 110 82 18 585
Robert Rosén Sweden 14 411 0.8× 326 0.7× 313 0.9× 113 1.0× 68 0.8× 36 515
Anne Seidemann Germany 8 646 1.2× 476 1.1× 386 1.1× 223 2.0× 71 0.9× 14 747
Antonio J. Del Águila‐Carrasco Spain 14 356 0.7× 297 0.7× 303 0.9× 98 0.9× 83 1.0× 36 486
Encarna Alcón Spain 9 408 0.8× 391 0.9× 412 1.2× 45 0.4× 68 0.8× 18 574
Aristophanis Pallikaris Greece 10 237 0.5× 489 1.1× 357 1.0× 57 0.5× 144 1.8× 15 586
Len Zheleznyak United States 12 365 0.7× 278 0.6× 279 0.8× 176 1.6× 40 0.5× 26 493
Ronald Rabbetts United Kingdom 7 282 0.5× 255 0.6× 227 0.7× 90 0.8× 51 0.6× 12 443
Javier Ruiz‐Alcocer Spain 14 531 1.0× 472 1.1× 459 1.3× 53 0.5× 93 1.1× 44 623
Adelina Felipe Spain 11 361 0.7× 322 0.7× 417 1.2× 76 0.7× 36 0.4× 19 552
Ainhoa Molina‐Martín Spain 11 253 0.5× 220 0.5× 288 0.8× 91 0.8× 56 0.7× 53 467

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Calver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Calver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Calver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Calver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Calver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Calver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Calver. The network helps show where Richard Calver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Calver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Calver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Calver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Calver. Richard Calver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Ludlow, Amanda, et al.. (2015). Visual Performance and the Use of Colored Filters in Children Who Are Deaf. Optometry and Vision Science. 92(6). 690–699. 6 indexed citations
2.
Price, Holly, et al.. (2015). Near work‐induced transient myopia in Indian subjects. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 98(6). 541–546. 9 indexed citations
3.
Allen, Peter M., Hema Radhakrishnan, Holly Price, et al.. (2013). A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of a dual treatment on myopia progression: The Cambridge Anti‐Myopia Study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 33(3). 267–276. 19 indexed citations
4.
Ludlow, Amanda, et al.. (2013). Visual performance and ocular abnormalities in deaf children and young adults: a literature review. Acta Ophthalmologica. 92(4). 305–310. 14 indexed citations
5.
Price, Holly, et al.. (2013). The Cambridge Anti-Myopia Study. Optometry and Vision Science. 90(11). 1274–1283. 27 indexed citations
6.
Radhakrishnan, Hema, et al.. (2013). Peripheral Refractive Changes Associated with Myopia Progression. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(2). 1573–1573. 39 indexed citations
7.
Calver, Richard. (2010). The Health and Social Security Act 1984 and the price of spectacles among corporate practices in the United Kingdom (1980-2007): a review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 30(2). 113–123. 1 indexed citations
8.
Allen, Peter M., et al.. (2009). Increasing negative spherical aberration with soft contact lenses improves high and low contrast visual acuity in young adults. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 29(6). 593–601. 16 indexed citations
9.
Allen, Peter M., Hema Radhakrishnan, Richard Calver, et al.. (2009). Aberration Control and Vision Training as an Effective Means of Improving Accommodation in Individuals with Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(11). 5120–5120. 32 indexed citations
10.
Radhakrishnan, Hema, et al.. (2008). The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 29(1). 65–71. 32 indexed citations
11.
Calver, Richard, Hema Radhakrishnan, Ebi Peter Osuobeni, & Daniel J. O’Leary. (2007). Peripheral refraction for distance and near vision in emmetropes and myopes. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 27(6). 584–593. 63 indexed citations
12.
Radhakrishnan, Hema, Shahina Pardhan, Richard Calver, & Daniel J. O’Leary. (2004). Unequal Reduction in Visual Acuity with Positive and Negative Defocusing Lenses in Myopes. Optometry and Vision Science. 81(1). 14–17. 36 indexed citations
13.
Simunovic, Matthew P. & Richard Calver. (2004). Crowding under scotopic conditions. Vision Research. 44(10). 963–969. 8 indexed citations
14.
Radhakrishnan, Hema, Shahina Pardhan, Richard Calver, & Daniel J. O’Leary. (2004). Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes. Vision Research. 44(16). 1869–1878. 54 indexed citations
15.
Radhakrishnan, Hema, et al.. (2002). Effect of defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non‐myopes. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 22(6). 575–575. 2 indexed citations
16.
Smith, George, Michael J. Cox, Richard Calver, & Leon F. Garner. (2001). The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye. Vision Research. 41(2). 235–243. 111 indexed citations
17.
Cox, Michael J. & Richard Calver. (1999). Reassessing the theoretical accuracy of the crossed-cylinder aberroscope technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(10). 2343–2343. 1 indexed citations
18.
Calver, Richard, Michael J. Cox, & David B. Elliott. (1999). Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(9). 2069–2069. 115 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026