Michael J. Cox
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Holger DietzeRichard CalverDavid K. WarrenVictoria J. FraserMarin H. KollefMargaret A. OlsenMax M. CohenChristopher S. Hollenbeak
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (17 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Cox
51 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Epidemiology 743
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 448
- Ophthalmology 425
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 367
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 206
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Cox. The network helps show where Michael J. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Cox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Cox. Michael J. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION OF TRIAMCINOLONE FOR TREATMENT OF HUNNER’S ULCER SUBTYPE INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS | 2 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 43 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 443 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Michael J. Cox
Michael J. Cox is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Internal Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (367 citations), Ophthalmology (425 citations) and Epidemiology (743 citations). Michael J. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Holger Dietze, Richard Calver, David K. Warren, Victoria J. Fraser, Marin H. Kollef, Margaret A. Olsen, Max M. Cohen, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Sunita J. Shukla and David B. Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and The American Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.