Michael J. Cox

1.8k total citations
52 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Cox is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Cox has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Epidemiology, 15 papers in Ophthalmology and 14 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Cox's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Michael J. Cox is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (17 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (12 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Michael J. Cox collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Michael J. Cox's co-authors include Holger Dietze, Richard Calver, David K. Warren, Victoria J. Fraser, Marin H. Kollef, Margaret A. Olsen, Max M. Cohen, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Sunita J. Shukla and David B. Elliott and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and The American Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Cox

51 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Cox United Kingdom 17 743 448 425 367 206 52 1.4k
Stephen Flaherty United States 21 786 1.1× 240 0.5× 73 0.2× 336 0.9× 141 0.7× 40 1.9k
Cristian Palmière Switzerland 27 245 0.3× 584 1.3× 98 0.2× 198 0.5× 165 0.8× 136 2.3k
Johannes M. A. Daniels Netherlands 31 654 0.9× 211 0.5× 37 0.1× 123 0.3× 1.3k 6.3× 135 2.7k
Vincent J.M. DiMaio United States 23 120 0.2× 305 0.7× 347 0.8× 29 0.1× 142 0.7× 83 1.7k
Shireen M. Atabaki United States 25 484 0.7× 361 0.8× 36 0.1× 138 0.4× 56 0.3× 51 1.5k
Sudhin Thayyil United Kingdom 31 282 0.4× 1.2k 2.7× 17 0.0× 115 0.3× 797 3.9× 91 2.9k
Thomas T. Noguchi United States 22 147 0.2× 127 0.3× 45 0.1× 220 0.6× 191 0.9× 73 1.7k
Martin Chapman Canada 18 170 0.2× 315 0.7× 65 0.2× 102 0.3× 280 1.4× 36 1.6k
Johnny Wong Australia 14 174 0.2× 280 0.6× 179 0.4× 44 0.1× 69 0.3× 24 1.4k
William K. Hamilton United States 28 142 0.2× 212 0.5× 193 0.5× 200 0.5× 1.4k 6.8× 122 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Cox. The network helps show where Michael J. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Cox. Michael J. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pai, Menaka, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Marlies Ostermann, et al.. (2018). Low-molecular-weight heparin venous thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction: A subgroup analysis of the PROTECT trial. PLoS ONE. 13(6). e0198285–e0198285. 12 indexed citations
2.
Piazza, Gregory, Frederick A. Anderson, Thomas L. Ortel, et al.. (2013). Randomized Trial of Physician Alerts for Thromboprophylaxis after Discharge. The American Journal of Medicine. 126(5). 435–442. 22 indexed citations
3.
Lauzier, François, David Williamson, Donald Griesdale, et al.. (2012). 767. Critical Care Medicine. 40. 1–328. 2 indexed citations
5.
Cox, Michael J. & Holger Dietze. (2009). Correcting ocular spherical aberration with soft contact lenses.. Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford). 40 indexed citations
6.
Cox, Michael J., et al.. (2009). ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION OF TRIAMCINOLONE FOR TREATMENT OF HUNNER’S ULCER SUBTYPE INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2 indexed citations
7.
Byrne, Christopher, et al.. (2007). GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE AS A PRESENTATION OF CARNEY’S TRIAD. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 77(1-2). 88–90. 10 indexed citations
8.
Pesudovs, Konrad, et al.. (2005). Effect of cataract surgery incision location and intraocular lens type on ocular aberrations. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 31(4). 725–734. 43 indexed citations
9.
Dietze, Holger & Michael J. Cox. (2005). Limitations of Correcting Spherical Aberration With Aspheric Intraocular Lenses. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 21(5). S541–6. 63 indexed citations
10.
Dietze, Holger, et al.. (2003). Verification of Aspheric Contact Lens Back Surfaces. Optometry and Vision Science. 80(8). 596–605. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cox, Michael J., et al.. (2003). Wavefront Aberration and Its Relationship to the Accommodative Stimulus-Response Function in Myopic Subjects. Optometry and Vision Science. 80(2). 151–158. 66 indexed citations
12.
Dietze, Holger & Michael J. Cox. (2003). On- and Off-Eye Spherical Aberration of Soft Contact Lenses and Consequent Changes of Effective Lens Power. Optometry and Vision Science. 80(2). 126–134. 37 indexed citations
13.
Warren, David K., Sunita J. Shukla, Margaret A. Olsen, et al.. (2003). Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center*. Critical Care Medicine. 31(5). 1312–1317. 443 indexed citations
14.
Hoit, Brian D., Yasuchika Takeishi, Michael J. Cox, et al.. (2002). Remodeling of the left atrium in pacing-induced atrial cardiomyopathy. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 238(1-2). 145–150. 38 indexed citations
15.
Cox, Michael J. & Richard Calver. (1999). Reassessing the theoretical accuracy of the crossed-cylinder aberroscope technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 16(10). 2343–2343. 1 indexed citations
16.
Derrington, Andrew M. & Michael J. Cox. (1998). Temporal resolution of dichoptic and second-order motion mechanisms. Vision Research. 38(22). 3531–3539. 25 indexed citations
17.
Cox, Michael J. & Glyn Walsh. (1997). Improvements to and reliability of a new computer assisted crossed-cylinder aberroscope. SaE.1–SaE.1. 1 indexed citations
18.
Cox, Michael J. & Glyn Walsh. (1997). Reliability and Validity Studies of a New Computer-Assisted Crossed-Cylinder Aberroscope. Optometry and Vision Science. 74(7). 570–580. 6 indexed citations
19.
Barrett, Brendan T., Michael J. Cox, Anita J. Simmers, & Lyle S. Gray. (1997). Grating detection and orientation discrimination in amblyopia. Current Eye Research. 16(10). 1044–1049. 3 indexed citations
20.
Cox, Michael J. & Ivan C. J. Wood. (1991). Inter‐ and intra‐image variability in computer‐assisted optic nerve head assessment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 11(1). 36–43. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026