Richard C. Quittmeyer
- Geophysics top 5%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Atmospheric Science
- Geology
- Co-authors
- Klaus JacobA. L. KafkaJ. G. ArmbrusterNorman AbrahamsonRobert YoungsGabriel R. ToroJohn W. WhitneyKevin J. Coppersmith
- Topics
- earthquake and tectonic studies (8 papers)Seismic Waves and Analysis (4 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaPure and Applied Geophysics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard C. Quittmeyer
10 papers receiving 434 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Geophysics 437
- Civil and Structural Engineering 176
- Artificial Intelligence 45
- Atmospheric Science 40
- Geology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Richard C. Quittmeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard C. Quittmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard C. Quittmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard C. Quittmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard C. Quittmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard C. Quittmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard C. Quittmeyer. The network helps show where Richard C. Quittmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard C. Quittmeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard C. Quittmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard C. Quittmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard C. Quittmeyer. Richard C. Quittmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 129 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 59 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | SEISMOTECTONICS OF PAKISTAN: A REVIEW OF RESULTS FROM NETWORK DATA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CENTRAL HIMALAYA | 16 |
| 9 | 243 | |
| 10 | 21 |
About Richard C. Quittmeyer
Richard C. Quittmeyer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include earthquake and tectonic studies (8 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (4 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (437 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (176 citations) and Geology (26 citations). Richard C. Quittmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Jacob, A. L. Kafka, J. G. Armbruster, Norman Abrahamson, Robert Youngs, Gabriel R. Toro, John W. Whitney, Kevin J. Coppersmith, J.B. Savy and J. C. Stepp. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America and Pure and Applied Geophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.