Richard B. D’Eath
- Small Animals top 0.02%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.1%
- Genetics top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- A.B. LawrenceSimon P. TurnerEmma BaxterR. RoehePeter SandøeMarianne FarishS.A. EdwardsGareth Arnott
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (66 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (41 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEScientific ReportsBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard B. D’Eath
86 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Small Animals 2.6k
- Animal Science and Zoology 2.1k
- Genetics 964
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 607
- Social Psychology 499
Countries citing papers authored by Richard B. D’Eath
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard B. D’Eath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard B. D’Eath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard B. D’Eath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard B. D’Eath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard B. D’Eath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard B. D’Eath. The network helps show where Richard B. D’Eath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard B. D’Eath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard B. D’Eath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard B. D’Eath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard B. D’Eath. Richard B. D’Eath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 102 | |
| 8 | 86 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 131 | |
| 15 | Who mounts whom and why? Characteristics, causes and consequences of mounting behaviour in finishing pigs. | 1 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About Richard B. D’Eath
Richard B. D’Eath is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 86 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (66 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (41 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (2.6k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (2.1k citations) and Developmental Biology (170 citations). Richard B. D’Eath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include A.B. Lawrence, Simon P. Turner, Emma Baxter, R. Roehe, Peter Sandøe, Marianne Farish, S.A. Edwards, Gareth Arnott, Linda Keeling and B.J. Tolkamp. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.