Richard B. D’Eath

5.3k total citations
86 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Richard B. D’Eath is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard B. D’Eath has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Small Animals, 49 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 17 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Richard B. D’Eath's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (66 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (41 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers). Richard B. D’Eath is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (66 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (41 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers). Richard B. D’Eath collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Richard B. D’Eath's co-authors include A.B. Lawrence, Simon P. Turner, Emma Baxter, R. Roehe, Peter Sandøe, Marianne Farish, S.A. Edwards, Gareth Arnott, Linda Keeling and B.J. Tolkamp and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

In The Last Decade

Richard B. D’Eath

86 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Richard B. D’Eath
Simon P. Turner United Kingdom
T.B. Rodenburg Netherlands
Per Jensen Sweden
Birger Puppe Germany
Joy A. Mench United States
Ruth C. Newberry United States
Beat Wechsler Switzerland
Jan Langbein Germany
Simon P. Turner United Kingdom
Richard B. D’Eath
Citations per year, relative to Richard B. D’Eath Richard B. D’Eath (= 1×) peers Simon P. Turner

Countries citing papers authored by Richard B. D’Eath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard B. D’Eath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard B. D’Eath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard B. D’Eath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard B. D’Eath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard B. D’Eath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard B. D’Eath. The network helps show where Richard B. D’Eath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard B. D’Eath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard B. D’Eath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard B. D’Eath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard B. D’Eath. Richard B. D’Eath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dixon, Laura, Sarah Brocklehurst, Peter W.F. Wilson, et al.. (2024). Dilution of broiler breeder diets with oat hulls prolongs feeding but does not affect central control of appetite. Poultry Science. 103(12). 104262–104262. 2 indexed citations
2.
Dixon, Laura, Ian Dunn, Sarah Brocklehurst, et al.. (2022). The effects of feed restriction, time of day, and time since feeding on behavioral and physiological indicators of hunger in broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science. 101(5). 101838–101838. 16 indexed citations
3.
4.
Chou, Jen-Yun, Keelin O’Driscoll, Dale A. Sandercock, & Richard B. D’Eath. (2020). Can increased dietary fibre level and a single enrichment device reduce the risk of tail biting in undocked growing-finishing pigs in fully slatted systems?. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0241619–e0241619. 9 indexed citations
5.
Chou, Jen-Yun, Dale A. Sandercock, Richard B. D’Eath, & Keelin O’Driscoll. (2020). A High Enrichment Replenishment Rate Reduces Damaging Behaviors and Increases Growth Rate in Undocked Pigs Kept in Fully Slatted Pens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7. 584706–584706. 8 indexed citations
6.
Hansen, Christian Fink, et al.. (2019). The Effect of Straw, Rope, and Bite-Rite Treatment in Weaner Pens with a Tail Biting Outbreak. Animals. 9(6). 365–365. 11 indexed citations
7.
Wurtz, Kaitlin Elizabeth, Irene Camerlink, Richard B. D’Eath, et al.. (2019). Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 14(12). e0226669–e0226669. 102 indexed citations
8.
D’Eath, Richard B., et al.. (2018). Automatic early warning of tail biting in pigs: 3D cameras can detect lowered tail posture before an outbreak. PLoS ONE. 13(4). e0194524–e0194524. 86 indexed citations
9.
Chou, Jen-Yun, Richard B. D’Eath, Dale A. Sandercock, et al.. (2018). Use of different wood types as environmental enrichment to manage tail biting in docked pigs in a commercial fully-slatted system. Livestock Science. 213. 19–27. 25 indexed citations
10.
Camerlink, Irene, Marianne Farish, Richard B. D’Eath, Gareth Arnott, & Simon P. Turner. (2018). Long Term Benefits on Social Behaviour after Early Life Socialization of Piglets. Animals. 8(11). 192–192. 42 indexed citations
11.
Baxter, Emma, et al.. (2018). Early indicators of tail biting outbreaks in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 208. 7–13. 28 indexed citations
12.
Wilson, Peter W., Nasir Mukhtar, Sarah Brocklehurst, et al.. (2018). Sex differences in basal hypothalamic anorectic and orexigenic gene expression and the effect of quantitative and qualitative food restriction. Biology of Sex Differences. 9(1). 20–20. 11 indexed citations
13.
Lahrmann, H.P., et al.. (2017). More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd. animal. 11(10). 1825–1831. 47 indexed citations
14.
D’Eath, Richard B., Gareth Arnott, Simon P. Turner, et al.. (2014). Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?. animal. 8(9). 1479–1497. 131 indexed citations
15.
Hintze, Sara, et al.. (2013). Who mounts whom and why? Characteristics, causes and consequences of mounting behaviour in finishing pigs.. Behaviour. 1 indexed citations
16.
Sandilands, Victoria, et al.. (2012). The use of conditioned place preference to determine broiler preferences for quantitative or qualitative dietary restriction. British Poultry Science. 53(3). 291–306. 10 indexed citations
17.
Sandilands, Victoria, et al.. (2011). Too hungry to learn? Hungry broiler breeders fail to learn a Y-maze food quantity discrimination task. Animal Welfare. 20(4). 469–481. 13 indexed citations
18.
D’Eath, Richard B., J. Conington, A.B. Lawrence, I. Anna S. Olsson, & Peter Sandøe. (2010). Breeding for behavioural change in farm animals: practical, economic and ethical considerations. Animal Welfare. 19(S1). 17–27. 38 indexed citations
19.
Turner, Simon P., R. Roehe, Richard B. D’Eath, et al.. (2009). Genetic validation of postmixing skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of aggressiveness and the relationship with injuries under more stable social conditions. Journal of Animal Science. 87(10). 3076–3082. 99 indexed citations
20.
Jarvis, Susan, Richard B. D’Eath, Sheena K. Robson, & A.B. Lawrence. (2005). The effect of confinement during lactation on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and behaviour of primiparous sows. Physiology & Behavior. 87(2). 345–352. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026