Richard Arbour

1.2k total citations
41 papers, 667 citations indexed

About

Richard Arbour is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Arbour has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 667 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 11 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 10 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Richard Arbour's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (13 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (11 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers). Richard Arbour is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (13 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (11 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (9 papers). Richard Arbour collaborates with scholars based in United States, Qatar and Canada. Richard Arbour's co-authors include Debra Wiegand, Sangeeta Mehta, Claire McManus, Andrew J. Patterson, Maureen O. Meade, Bram Rochwerg, Judith Jacobi, Ann Tescher, Brian L. Erstad and Richard M. Pino and has published in prestigious journals such as CHEST Journal, Critical Care Medicine and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.

In The Last Decade

Richard Arbour

38 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Richard Arbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 312
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 219
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 159
  • Emergency Medicine 137
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 133
Replace Reuben J. Strayer with:
Reuben J. Strayer United States
Lluís Cabré Spain
Erin Rosenberg Canada
J. Polasek Germany
P. Lavagne France
Theresia Hummel Germany
Daniele Bryden United Kingdom
Maged Tanios United States
Gerald A. Maccioli United States
Reuben J. Strayer United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Richard Arbour
Richard Arbour · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Richard Arbour
Richard Arbour · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Arbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Arbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Arbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Arbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Arbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Arbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Arbour. The network helps show where Richard Arbour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Arbour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Arbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Arbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Arbour. Richard Arbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 9
4 8
5 35
6 0
7 17
8 1
9 14
10 20
11 36
12 13
13 27
14 33
15 13
16 20
17 11
18 35
19 7
20 4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026