Richard A. Humber
- Insect Science top 0.05%
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Ecology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Stephen A. RehnerJoseph F. BischoffAnn E. HajekCláudia C. López LastraChristian LuzJanet Jennifer Luangsa-ardGi‐Ho SungRyan M. Kepler
- Topics
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (139 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (56 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (44 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilChile
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Humber
194 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Insect Science 4.0k
- Plant Science 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Cell Biology 1.0k
- Ecology 833
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Humber
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Humber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Humber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Humber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Humber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Humber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Humber. The network helps show where Richard A. Humber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Humber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Humber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Humber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Humber. Richard A. Humber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 186 | |
| 8 | 169 | |
| 9 | 312 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | Classical biological control of North American gypsy moth by Japanese Entomophaga maimaiga: 80 years after the initial introductions. | 1 |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Richard A. Humber
Richard A. Humber is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cell Biology and Plant Science, having authored 195 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (139 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (56 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (44 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (4.0k citations), Plant Science (3.0k citations) and Cell Biology (1.0k citations). Richard A. Humber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Rehner, Joseph F. Bischoff, Ann E. Hajek, Cláudia C. López Lastra, Christian Luz, Janet Jennifer Luangsa-ard, Gi‐Ho Sung, Ryan M. Kepler, Luis Devotto and Andrew M. Minnis. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.