Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review on Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT)
2015319 citationsMahdi H. Miraz, Maaruf Ali et al.arXiv (Cornell University)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rich Picking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rich Picking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rich Picking more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rich Picking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rich Picking. The network helps show where Rich Picking may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rich Picking
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rich Picking.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rich Picking based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rich Picking. Rich Picking is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miraz, Mahdi H., Maaruf Ali, P.S. Excell, & Rich Picking. (2015). A review on Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT). arXiv (Cornell University). 219–224.319 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Cunningham, Stuart & Rich Picking. (2012). Sounds Relaxing—Looks Cool. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence. 4(1). 40–53.3 indexed citations
Picking, Rich, et al.. (2009). Simplicity, consistency, universality and familiarity: applying ‘SCUF’ principles to technology for assisted living.2 indexed citations
9.
Picking, Rich, et al.. (2009). An Investigation into Signal Strength of 802.11n WLAN.13 indexed citations
10.
Grout, Vic, et al.. (2008). Prediction of Wireless Network Signal Strength within a Building. 193–207.13 indexed citations
11.
Grout, Vic, et al.. (2008). A Survey of Applying Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Actuator Networks to Enhance Context-Awareness in Environmental Management Systems. 77–90.1 indexed citations
12.
Picking, Rich, et al.. (2008). Internet Plagiarism: A Survey and Case Study.2 indexed citations
13.
Picking, Rich, et al.. (2008). A Framework for Improving User Experience in Ambient Assisted Living.3 indexed citations
14.
Grout, Vic, et al.. (2007). Assistive Human-Machine Interfaces for Smart Homes.2 indexed citations
15.
Grout, Vic, Stuart Cunningham, & Rich Picking. (2007). Practical Large-Scale Network Design with Variable Costs for Links and Switches.3 indexed citations
Grout, Vic, et al.. (2006). Rule Dependencies in Access Control Lists.6 indexed citations
18.
Picking, Rich, et al.. (2006). Remote-Controlled Home Automation Systems with Different Network Technologies.37 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.