Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review on Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT)
2015319 citationsMahdi H. Miraz, Maaruf Ali et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P.S. Excell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.S. Excell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.S. Excell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.S. Excell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.S. Excell. The network helps show where P.S. Excell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P.S. Excell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P.S. Excell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P.S. Excell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P.S. Excell. P.S. Excell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parchin, Naser Ojaroudi, et al.. (2020). A Design of Beam-Steerable Antenna Array for Use in Future Mobile Handsets. Journal of information and communication convergence engineering. 14(5). 133–139.1 indexed citations
2.
Parchin, Naser Ojaroudi, Haleh Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, Yasir I. A. Al‐Yasir, et al.. (2020). 60 GHz Multi-Sector Antenna Array with Switchable Radiation-Beams for Small Cell 5G Networks. Journal of information and communication convergence engineering. 14(2). 50–54.
3.
Miraz, Mahdi H. & P.S. Excell. (2018). Internet of Nano-Things, Things and Everything: Future Growth Trends.51 indexed citations
4.
Miraz, Mahdi H., Maaruf Ali, & P.S. Excell. (2016). Design for All: Catering for Culturally Diverse Users. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Elfergani, Issa, et al.. (2011). A dual-band frequency tunable planar inverted F antenna. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 223–227.4 indexed citations
7.
See, Chan Hwang, et al.. (2011). PIFA antenna for UWB applications with WLAN band rejection using spiral slots. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 2226–2229.2 indexed citations
8.
Ramli, Khairun Nidzam, et al.. (2011). Interaction of EM fields to the human body using MoM-FDTD-SGFDTD hybrid computational method. International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. 571–574.2 indexed citations
See, Chan Hwang, et al.. (2010). Small wideband antenna for GSM and WLAN applications. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 1–4.1 indexed citations
Abd‐Alhameed, Raed A., Chan Hwang See, N.J. McEwan, et al.. (2009). SAR measurements for several two elements phased antenna array handsets. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 2201–2204.5 indexed citations
13.
Zhou, Dawei, et al.. (2009). New balanced mobile antenna with wide bandwidth performance. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 549–552.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.