Ricardo C. Ainslie

521 total citations
28 papers, 326 citations indexed

About

Ricardo C. Ainslie is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Ricardo C. Ainslie has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 326 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Ricardo C. Ainslie's work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). Ricardo C. Ainslie is often cited by papers focused on Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). Ricardo C. Ainslie collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Israel. Ricardo C. Ainslie's co-authors include Amanda W. Harrist, Carollee Howes, Kalina M. Brabeck, Pratyusha Tummala–Narra, Antal E. Solyom, Luis Sandoval, Mark T. Hegel, Jay C. Buckey, William S. Stone and Martin L. Tombari and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Behavior Therapy and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Ricardo C. Ainslie

28 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ricardo C. Ainslie United States 10 170 111 106 71 47 28 326
Erica J. Mindes United States 6 107 0.6× 154 1.4× 76 0.7× 74 1.0× 43 0.9× 8 341
Linda M. Perosa United States 13 179 1.1× 146 1.3× 123 1.2× 54 0.8× 60 1.3× 21 350
Tamara Williams Canada 6 89 0.5× 113 1.0× 74 0.7× 54 0.8× 20 0.4× 11 254
Amy M. Kolak United States 10 172 1.0× 97 0.9× 85 0.8× 102 1.4× 48 1.0× 17 299
Clorinda E. Vélez United States 8 210 1.2× 100 0.9× 132 1.2× 114 1.6× 53 1.1× 12 362
Sandra L. Perosa United States 12 163 1.0× 119 1.1× 106 1.0× 42 0.6× 58 1.2× 18 308
Robert F. Stahmann United States 11 116 0.7× 164 1.5× 90 0.8× 98 1.4× 28 0.6× 30 307
Caroline O. Vaillant United Kingdom 6 153 0.9× 192 1.7× 100 0.9× 105 1.5× 23 0.5× 6 417
Kurt Kreppner Germany 9 150 0.9× 103 0.9× 80 0.8× 90 1.3× 73 1.6× 32 312
Karen S. Rosen United States 7 279 1.6× 244 2.2× 104 1.0× 114 1.6× 54 1.1× 10 412

Countries citing papers authored by Ricardo C. Ainslie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ricardo C. Ainslie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ricardo C. Ainslie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ricardo C. Ainslie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ricardo C. Ainslie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ricardo C. Ainslie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ricardo C. Ainslie. The network helps show where Ricardo C. Ainslie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ricardo C. Ainslie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ricardo C. Ainslie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ricardo C. Ainslie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ricardo C. Ainslie. Ricardo C. Ainslie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ward, Peter M., et al.. (2020). Understanding community health needs and forging an academic global health partnership in Puebla, Mexico: a mixed methods study. The Lancet Global Health. 8. S13–S13. 2 indexed citations
2.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (2017). Immigration, Psychic Dislocation, and the Re-creation of Community. The Psychoanalytic Review. 104(6). 695–706. 2 indexed citations
3.
Sandoval, Luis, Jay C. Buckey, Ricardo C. Ainslie, et al.. (2016). Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computerized Interactive Media-Based Problem Solving Treatment for Depression. Behavior Therapy. 48(3). 413–425. 26 indexed citations
4.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (2012). Cultural Mourning, Immigration, and Engagement: Vignettes from the Mexican Experience. 221–230. 14 indexed citations
5.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (2009). Social class and its reproduction in immigrants’ construction of self. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. 14(3). 213–224. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (2009). Regression in the construction of the immigrant other. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. 14(1). 49–57. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brabeck, Kalina M. & Ricardo C. Ainslie. (2008). The Narration of Collective Trauma: The “True Story” of Jasper, Texas. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. 13(2). 123–142. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ainslie, Ricardo C., et al.. (2005). Long Dark Road: Bill King and Murder in Jasper, Texas. The Journal of Southern History. 71(4). 954–954. 6 indexed citations
9.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (2004). Long Dark Road. University of Texas Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
10.
Ainslie, Ricardo C. & Kalina M. Brabeck. (2003). Race Murder and Community Trauma: Psychoanalysis and Ethnography in Exploring the Impact of the Killing of James Byrd in Jasper, Texas. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society. 8(1). 42–50. 17 indexed citations
11.
Cookston, Jeffrey T., Amanda W. Harrist, & Ricardo C. Ainslie. (2003). Affiliative and Instrumental Marital Discord, Mother's Negative Affect, and Children's Negative Interactions with Unfamiliar Peers. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 12(2). 185–200. 9 indexed citations
12.
Harrist, Amanda W. & Ricardo C. Ainslie. (1998). Marital Discord and Child Behavior Problems. Journal of Family Issues. 19(2). 140–163. 71 indexed citations
13.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (1995). No Dancin' in Anson: An American Story of Race and Social Change. 7 indexed citations
14.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (1990). Family and center contributions to the adjustment of infants in full-time day care. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 1990(49). 39–52. 14 indexed citations
15.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (1989). Masters of the Universe: Children's Toys as Reflections on Contemporary Psychoanalytic Theory. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis. 17(4). 579–595. 2 indexed citations
16.
Ainslie, Ricardo C., et al.. (1987). The early developmental context of twinship: Some limitations of the equal environments hypothesis.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 57(1). 120–124. 5 indexed citations
17.
Howes, Carollee & Ricardo C. Ainslie. (1987). The Child and the Day Care Setting: Qualitative Variations and Development.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 16(2). 241–241. 31 indexed citations
18.
Ainslie, Ricardo C. & Antal E. Solyom. (1986). The replacement of the fantasied oedipal child: A disruptive effect of sibling loss on the mother-infant relationship.. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 3(3). 257–268. 3 indexed citations
19.
Ainslie, Ricardo C., Antal E. Solyom, & Michael E. McManus. (1982). On the infant's meaning for the parent: A study of four mother-daughter pairs. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 13(2). 97–110. 4 indexed citations
20.
Ainslie, Ricardo C.. (1979). Separation-individuation And The Psychology Of Twinship.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026