Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Resource Central
2017402 citationsEli Cortez, Mark Russinovich et al.profile →
Page placement in hybrid memory systems
2011310 citationsRicardo Bianchini et al.profile →
Pond: CXL-Based Memory Pooling Systems for Cloud Platforms
2023140 citationsDaniel S. Berger, Stanko Novaković et al.profile →
Splitwise: Efficient Generative LLM Inference Using Phase Splitting
202467 citationsPratyush Patel, Esha Choukse et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ricardo Bianchini
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ricardo Bianchini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ricardo Bianchini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ricardo Bianchini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ricardo Bianchini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ricardo Bianchini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ricardo Bianchini. The network helps show where Ricardo Bianchini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ricardo Bianchini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ricardo Bianchini.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ricardo Bianchini based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ricardo Bianchini. Ricardo Bianchini is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shahrad, Mohammad, Rodrigo Fonseca, Íñigo Goiri, et al.. (2020). Serverless in the Wild: Characterizing and Optimizing the Serverless Workload at a Large Cloud Provider. arXiv (Cornell University). 205–218.12 indexed citations
8.
Goiri, Íñigo, et al.. (2017). Scaling distributed file systems in resource-harvesting datacenters. USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 799–811.4 indexed citations
Bianchini, Ricardo & Prabal Dutta. (2011). Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Power-Aware Computing and Systems.1 indexed citations
13.
Heath, Taliver, et al.. (2006). Mercury and freon. 106–116.158 indexed citations
14.
Nagaraja, Kiran, et al.. (2006). Understanding and validating database system administration. USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 19–19.24 indexed citations
15.
Bianchini, Ricardo, et al.. (2005). Human-aware computer system design. 13–13.3 indexed citations
16.
Nagaraja, Kiran, et al.. (2004). Understanding and dealing with operator mistakes in internet services. Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 5–5.76 indexed citations
17.
Nagaraja, Kiran, Xiaoyan Li, Ricardo Bianchini, Richard P. Martin, & Thu D. Nguyen. (2003). Using fault injection and modeling to evaluate the performability of cluster-based services. 2–2.21 indexed citations
Santos, Rodrigo Weber dos, Ricardo Bianchini, & Cláudio L. Amorim. (2001). A survey of messaging software issues and systems for Myrinet-based clusters. Cluster Computing. 133–146.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.