Rhema Linder
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Mechanical Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Co-authors
- Andruid KerneAndrew M. WebbJohanna SilvennoinenJonas OppenlaenderSteven M. SmithFan YangSina MohseniJosef Ingenerf
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers)Personal Information Management and User Behavior (5 papers)Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Rhema Linder
17 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Human-Computer Interaction 93
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
- Mechanical Engineering 53
- Artificial Intelligence 50
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 47
Countries citing papers authored by Rhema Linder
This map shows the geographic impact of Rhema Linder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhema Linder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhema Linder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rhema Linder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhema Linder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhema Linder. The network helps show where Rhema Linder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhema Linder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhema Linder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhema Linder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhema Linder. Rhema Linder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Searching to Measure the Novelty of Collected Ideas | 1 |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Rhema Linder
Rhema Linder is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications and Information Systems and Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (7 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (5 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (93 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations) and Computer Science Applications (35 citations). Rhema Linder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andruid Kerne, Andrew M. Webb, Johanna Silvennoinen, Jonas Oppenlaender, Steven M. Smith, Fan Yang, Sina Mohseni, Josef Ingenerf, Eric D. Ragan and Xia Hu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.