Rhea T. Eskew

1.5k total citations
61 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Rhea T. Eskew is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rhea T. Eskew has authored 61 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 34 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 26 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rhea T. Eskew's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (43 papers), Color Science and Applications (33 papers) and Color perception and design (25 papers). Rhea T. Eskew is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (43 papers), Color Science and Applications (33 papers) and Color perception and design (25 papers). Rhea T. Eskew collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Bangladesh. Rhea T. Eskew's co-authors include C.F. Stromeyer, Richard E. Kronauer, Alex Chaparro, Robert M. Boynton, Jessica R. Newton, Allen L. Nagy, James McLellan, Akemi Ryu, Junhee Lee and Frances J Rucker and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Brain.

In The Last Decade

Rhea T. Eskew

55 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rhea T. Eskew United States	20	955	544	409	132	110	61	1.1k
Hannah E. Smithson United Kingdom	16	791 0.8×	351 0.6×	337 0.8×	210 1.6×	110 1.0×	73	1.0k
D. I. A. MacLeod United States	16	596 0.6×	235 0.4×	165 0.4×	124 0.9×	102 0.9×	29	683
Nicolas P. Cottaris United States	15	726 0.8×	244 0.4×	184 0.4×	132 1.0×	225 2.0×	36	852
C. R. Cavonius Germany	17	719 0.8×	287 0.5×	227 0.6×	145 1.1×	81 0.7×	55	926
Carl R. Ingling United States	14	793 0.8×	476 0.9×	310 0.8×	175 1.3×	88 0.8×	27	887
Graeme R. Cole Australia	8	556 0.6×	363 0.7×	243 0.6×	83 0.6×	60 0.5×	14	613
B. R. Wooten United States	18	618 0.6×	288 0.5×	394 1.0×	223 1.7×	51 0.5×	47	1.2k
Declan J. McKeefry United Kingdom	23	1.6k 1.6×	245 0.5×	254 0.6×	379 2.9×	231 2.1×	76	1.8k
Jenny M. Bosten United Kingdom	21	714 0.7×	197 0.4×	371 0.9×	117 0.9×	36 0.3×	53	1.1k
Lawrence E. Arend United States	19	1.4k 1.5×	967 1.8×	769 1.9×	85 0.6×	36 0.3×	39	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Rhea T. Eskew

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhea T. Eskew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhea T. Eskew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhea T. Eskew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhea T. Eskew

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhea T. Eskew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhea T. Eskew. The network helps show where Rhea T. Eskew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhea T. Eskew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhea T. Eskew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhea T. Eskew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhea T. Eskew. Rhea T. Eskew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (2024). Asymmetries between achromatic increments and decrements: Perceptual scales and discrimination thresholds. Journal of Vision. 24(4). 10–10. 2 indexed citations

Mingolla, Ennio, et al.. (2024). Psychophysics of neon color spreading: Chromatic and temporal factors are not limiting. Vision Research. 223. 108460–108460.

Rucker, Frances J, Rhea T. Eskew, & Christopher Taylor. (2020). Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick. Experimental Eye Research. 198. 108126–108126. 24 indexed citations

Conway, Bevil R., Rhea T. Eskew, Paul R. Martin, & Andrew Stockman. (2018). A tour of contemporary color vision research. Vision Research. 151. 2–6. 20 indexed citations

Kleckner, Ian R., et al.. (2018). Conscious awareness is necessary for affective faces to influence social judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 79. 181–187. 8 indexed citations

Wang, Qi, et al.. (2014). Noise masking of S-cone increments and decrements. Journal of Vision. 14(13). 8–8. 13 indexed citations

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (2013). Highly-selective chromatic masking does not require large numbers of color mechanisms. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 296–296. 1 indexed citations

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (2013). Color mechanisms revealed by measuring detection and discrimination together.. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 1013–1013. 1 indexed citations

Eskew, Rhea T.. (2009). Higher order color mechanisms: A critical review. Vision Research. 49(22). 2686–2704. 63 indexed citations

10.

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (2007). Theory of chromatic noise masking applied to testing linearity of S-cone detection mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 24(9). 2604–2604. 9 indexed citations

11.

Newton, Jessica R. & Rhea T. Eskew. (2003). Chromatic detection and discrimination in the periphery: A postreceptoral loss of color sensitivity. Visual Neuroscience. 20(5). 511–521. 30 indexed citations

12.

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (2001). Chromatic detection and discrimination analyzed by a Bayesian classifier. Vision Research. 41(7). 893–909. 26 indexed citations

13.

McLellan, James & Rhea T. Eskew. (2000). ON and OFF S-cone pathways have different long-wave cone inputs. Vision Research. 40(18). 2449–2465. 40 indexed citations

14.

Eskew, Rhea T., et al.. (1998). Chromatic masking in the (ΔL/L, ΔM/M) plane of cone-contrast space reveals only two detection mechanisms. Vision Research. 38(24). 3913–3926. 60 indexed citations

15.

Eskew, Rhea T., C.F. Stromeyer, & Richard E. Kronauer. (1994). Temporal properties of the red-green chromatic mechanism. Vision Research. 34(23). 3127–3137. 19 indexed citations

16.

Eskew, Rhea T., C.F. Stromeyer, & Richard E. Kronauer. (1992). The Constancy of Equiluminant Red-Green Thresholds Examined in Two Color Spaces. A7. SaC2–SaC2. 3 indexed citations

17.

Stromeyer, C.F., Junhee Lee, & Rhea T. Eskew. (1992). Peripheral chromatic sensitivity for flashes: A post-peceptoral red-green asymmetry. Vision Research. 32(10). 1865–1873. 45 indexed citations

18.

Eskew, Rhea T. & Robert M. Boynton. (1987). Effects of field area and configuration on chromatic and border discriminations. Vision Research. 27(10). 1835–1844. 16 indexed citations

19.

Boynton, Robert M., Allen L. Nagy, & Rhea T. Eskew. (1986). Similarity of Normalized Discrimination Ellipses in the Constant-Luminance Chromaticity Plane. Perception. 15(6). 755–763. 23 indexed citations

20.

Nagy, Allen L., Rhea T. Eskew, & Robert M. Boynton. (1985). Color discrimination contours in a cone excitation space. Annual Meeting Optical Society of America. TUJ4–TUJ4. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact