Rhea Liang

25 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Rhea Liang
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Gender Studies 127
  • Oncology 122
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
  • Cancer Research 54
  • Emergency Medical Services 25
Replace Sudha Amarnath with:
Sudha Amarnath United States
Tomas Sjöberg Bexelius Sweden
Tiannan Zhan United States
Michael Porter United States
Laurence Albiges‐Sauvin France
Maggie L. Westfal United States
Genaro Fernandez United States
James M. McGreevy United States
Elizabeth Ryan United States
Jonathan Witonsky United States
Rhea Liang relative to Sudha Amarnath United States Sudha Amarnath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Sudha Amarnath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rhea Liang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhea Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhea Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhea Liang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhea Liang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhea Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhea Liang. The network helps show where Rhea Liang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rhea Liang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rhea Liang Line = papers co-authored together Rhea Liang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019135
2 202165
3 200838
4 202034
5 202023
6 201920
7 200319
8 201718
9 201617
10 202016
11 202010
12 20229
13 20209
14 20218
15 20227
16 20245
17 20243
18 20243
19 20212
20 20212

About Rhea Liang

Rhea Liang is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gender Studies and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers) and Dental Education, Practice, Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (127 citations), Oncology (122 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations), Cancer Research (54 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (25 citations). Rhea Liang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Debra Nestel, Tim Dornan, Habib Rahman, Andrew J. Cameron, Bradley Ng, Wendy Chaboyer, Brigid M. Gillespie, Weiva Sieh, Lukman Thalib and Jasotha Sanmugarajah. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, British journal of surgery, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, International Journal of Surgery and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact