Rhea Liang

1.2k total citations
28 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

Rhea Liang is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Rhea Liang has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Oncology, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Rhea Liang's work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers). Rhea Liang is often cited by papers focused on Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers). Rhea Liang collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Rhea Liang's co-authors include Debra Nestel, Tim Dornan, Habib Rahman, Andrew J. Cameron, Bradley Ng, Wendy Chaboyer, Brigid M. Gillespie, Jafi A. Lipson, Robert S. Ware and Dominic Lunn and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nature Communications and American Journal of Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Rhea Liang

25 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rhea Liang Australia 11 127 122 116 103 78 28 448
James M. McGreevy United States 11 44 0.3× 28 0.2× 71 0.6× 308 3.0× 36 0.5× 23 512
Michael Porter United States 10 22 0.2× 94 0.8× 31 0.3× 124 1.2× 79 1.0× 23 400
Jonathan Witonsky United States 6 17 0.1× 49 0.4× 69 0.6× 28 0.3× 49 0.6× 8 445
Sudha Amarnath United States 10 41 0.3× 69 0.6× 87 0.8× 57 0.6× 63 0.8× 23 386
Tomas Sjöberg Bexelius Sweden 13 33 0.3× 99 0.8× 60 0.5× 144 1.4× 32 0.4× 29 435
Justin T. Brady United States 12 34 0.3× 218 1.8× 60 0.5× 225 2.2× 27 0.3× 47 463
Erryk Katayama United States 11 11 0.1× 198 1.6× 61 0.5× 119 1.2× 43 0.6× 74 412
Justin Loloi United States 10 18 0.1× 19 0.2× 52 0.4× 80 0.8× 74 0.9× 88 416
Kathy Wilkinson United States 10 10 0.1× 62 0.5× 171 1.5× 60 0.6× 58 0.7× 21 420
Soumya J. Niranjan United States 11 27 0.2× 84 0.7× 224 1.9× 9 0.1× 153 2.0× 31 457

Countries citing papers authored by Rhea Liang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhea Liang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhea Liang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhea Liang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhea Liang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhea Liang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhea Liang. The network helps show where Rhea Liang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhea Liang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhea Liang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhea Liang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhea Liang. Rhea Liang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bisset, Carly, R J Baigrie, Nicola Dames, et al.. (2025). The science and art of decision-making in surgery. British journal of surgery. 112(11).
2.
Liang, Rhea, John Orchard, & Stephen Robson. (2025). The global surgical triple goal: Surgery must improve health, be equitable, and environmentally sustainable. The Journal of Climate Change and Health. 23. 100458–100458.
3.
White, Sarah J., et al.. (2024). “Sorry for Holding You Up”: Surgeons’ Apologies for Lateness in Clinic Settings. Health Communication. 39(13). 2997–3008. 1 indexed citations
4.
Tobiano, Georgia, et al.. (2024). Clinicians' views on implementing enhanced recovery after surgery: a descriptive qualitative study. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 95(1-2). 240–246.
6.
Kiely, Belinda E., et al.. (2024). Safety of vaginal oestrogens for genitourinary symptoms in women with breast cancer. Australian Journal of General Practice. 53(5). 305–310. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brandenburg, Caitlin, Christy Noble, Rhea Liang, et al.. (2024). “Luck of the draw really”: a qualitative exploration of Australian trainee doctors’ experiences of mandatory research. BMC Medical Education. 24(1). 1021–1021. 3 indexed citations
8.
Liang, Rhea. (2023). On being entirely ordinary. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 93(4). 804–806. 1 indexed citations
10.
Zaman, Sarah, Elizabeth Shaw, Melissa Leung, et al.. (2022). Representation of Women in Internal Medicine Specialties in North America, the United Kingdom, and Australasia: Cardiology's Outlier Status and the Importance of Diversity. The American Journal of Cardiology. 185. 122–128. 7 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Cameron, Rachael Moorin, Christobel Saunders, et al.. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of radioguided occult lesion localization using 125I seeds versus hookwire localization before breast-conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. British journal of surgery. 108(7). 843–850. 8 indexed citations
12.
Gillespie, Brigid M., Emma Harbeck, Megan Rattray, et al.. (2021). Worldwide incidence of surgical site infections in general surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 488,594 patients. International Journal of Surgery. 95. 106136–106136. 65 indexed citations
14.
Sieh, Weiva, Joseph H. Rothstein, Robert J. Klein, et al.. (2020). Identification of 31 loci for mammographic density phenotypes and their associations with breast cancer risk. Nature Communications. 11(1). 5116–5116. 23 indexed citations
15.
Sanmugarajah, Jasotha, et al.. (2020). Unmet needs in breast cancer survivors are common, and multidisciplinary care is underutilised: the Survivorship Needs Assessment Project. Breast Cancer. 28(2). 289–297. 34 indexed citations
16.
McBride, Russell B., Joseph H. Rothstein, Stacey Alexeeff, et al.. (2020). Alcohol and Tobacco Use in Relation to Mammographic Density in 23,456 Women. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 29(5). 1039–1048. 10 indexed citations
17.
Liang, Rhea, Tim Dornan, & Debra Nestel. (2019). Why do women leave surgical training? A qualitative and feminist study. The Lancet. 393(10171). 541–549. 135 indexed citations
18.
Alexeeff, Stacey, Jafi A. Lipson, Ninah Achacoso, et al.. (2017). Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 26(9). 1450–1458. 18 indexed citations
19.
Habel, Laurel A., Jafi A. Lipson, Ninah Achacoso, et al.. (2016). Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Research. 18(1). 53–53. 17 indexed citations
20.
Ng, Bradley, Andrew J. Cameron, Rhea Liang, & Habib Rahman. (2008). Serotonin syndrome following methylene blue infusion during parathyroidectomy: A case report and literature review. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 55(1). 36–41. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026