René Eber

454 total citations · 1 hit paper
4 papers, 248 citations indexed

About

René Eber is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, René Eber has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 248 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Health Informatics, 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 1 paper in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in René Eber's work include Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). René Eber is often cited by papers focused on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). René Eber collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. René Eber's co-authors include Leo Anthony Celi, Marie‐Laure Charpignon, Jacqueline Cellini, Lama Moukheiber, Joel Park, Edward Christopher Dee, William Mitchell, Julian Schirmer, Joseph Alexander Paguio and Franck Dernoncourt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

In The Last Decade

René Eber

4 papers receiving 243 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review

2022 232 citations Leo Anthony Celi, Jacqueline Cellini et al. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
René Eber France	3	143	63	59	52	29	4	248
Julian Schirmer Germany	4	135 0.9×	56 0.9×	58 1.0×	47 0.9×	44 1.5×	13	263
Mira Moukheiber United States	5	133 0.9×	64 1.0×	52 0.9×	42 0.8×	18 0.6×	7	287
Janny Xue Chen Ke Canada	8	131 0.9×	61 1.0×	46 0.8×	41 0.8×	17 0.6×	23	332
Abdullah H. Alreedy Saudi Arabia	4	195 1.4×	77 1.2×	91 1.5×	42 0.8×	36 1.2×	9	363
Yuri Yin‐Moe Aung United Kingdom	2	157 1.1×	53 0.8×	84 1.4×	39 0.8×	21 0.7×	5	266
Sebastian Fritsch Germany	6	152 1.1×	77 1.2×	64 1.1×	45 0.9×	25 0.9×	27	327
Natalia Norori United Kingdom	4	198 1.4×	103 1.6×	93 1.6×	47 0.9×	40 1.4×	8	421
William Mitchell United States	9	137 1.0×	59 0.9×	110 1.9×	52 1.0×	34 1.2×	22	421
Charisma Hehakaya Netherlands	5	133 0.9×	43 0.7×	126 2.1×	28 0.5×	37 1.3×	10	240
Jack Gallifant United States	9	77 0.5×	58 0.9×	31 0.5×	46 0.9×	20 0.7×	29	233

Countries citing papers authored by René Eber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of René Eber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by René Eber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites René Eber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by René Eber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by René Eber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by René Eber. The network helps show where René Eber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of René Eber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of René Eber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of René Eber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with René Eber. René Eber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

4 of 4 papers shown

1.

Charpignon, Marie‐Laure, Leo Anthony Celi, René Eber, et al.. (2024). Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(7). e0000486–e0000486. 3 indexed citations

2.

Celi, Leo Anthony, Jacqueline Cellini, Marie‐Laure Charpignon, et al.. (2022). Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(3). e0000022–e0000022. 232 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

George, Naomi, Edward T. Moseley, René Eber, et al.. (2021). Deep learning to predict long-term mortality in patients requiring 7 days of mechanical ventilation. PLoS ONE. 16(6). e0253443–e0253443. 12 indexed citations

4.

Eber, René, et al.. (2021). Emerging innovation patterns in digital agriculture: A study of 198 digital solutions from 116 startups. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact