Edward T. Moseley
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Machine Learning in Healthcare 5
- Topic Modeling 2
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 7
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 2
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 3
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 3
-
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 2
-
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- Leo Anthony CeliCharlotta LindvallEric T. CarlsonFranck DernoncourtJoy T. WuYeran LiJonathan WeltPatrick D. Tyler
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Edward T. Moseley
17 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Health Informatics 63
- Health Information Management 63
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
- Artificial Intelligence 208
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 112
Countries citing papers authored by Edward T. Moseley
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward T. Moseley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward T. Moseley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward T. Moseley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward T. Moseley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward T. Moseley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward T. Moseley. The network helps show where Edward T. Moseley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward T. Moseley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 146 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 12 |
About Edward T. Moseley
Edward T. Moseley is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Informatics and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (63 citations), Health Information Management (63 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations). Edward T. Moseley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Leo Anthony Celi, Charlotta Lindvall, Eric T. Carlson, Franck Dernoncourt, Joy T. Wu, Yeran Li, Jonathan Welt, Patrick D. Tyler, Sebastian Gehrmann and John Foote. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, PLoS ONE, Big Data, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.