Rebecca Starr

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 754 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Starr is a scholar working on Surgery, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Starr has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 754 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 2 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Starr's work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). Rebecca Starr is often cited by papers focused on Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). Rebecca Starr collaborates with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Rebecca Starr's co-authors include Nancy J. Tarbell, Reshma Jagsi, Elaine M. Hylek, Elizabeth A. Guancial, Lori Henault, Yuchiao Chang, Kathryn Tout, Kimberly Boller, Mihaela Stefan and Diana O. Treaba and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Starr

8 papers receiving 734 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective

2006 653 citations Reshma Jagsi, Elizabeth A. Guancial et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers

Rebecca Starr

GS

PHEOH

GHP

EMS

SP

Samantha E. Kaplan United States

Dana Sambuco United States

Julie A. Poorman United States

Luanne E. Thorndyke United States

Michelle D. Lall United States

Annie Wong United States

Margaret A. McLaughlin United States

A. Hal Strelnick United States

Susan Hingle United States

Eliana Bonifacino United States

Samantha E. Kaplan United States

Rebecca Starr

809 ×1.3

GS

625 ×1.3

PHEOH

197 ×1.1

GHP

180 ×2.1

EMS

99 ×1.2

SP

Citations per year, relative to Rebecca Starr Rebecca Starr (= 1×) peers Samantha E. Kaplan

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Starr

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Starr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Starr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Starr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Starr

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Starr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Starr. The network helps show where Rebecca Starr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Starr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Starr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Starr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Starr. Rebecca Starr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Starr, Rebecca, et al.. (2021). Time Doesn't Heal All Wounds: Incorporating Trauma-Informed Principles in Practice. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 47(10). 54–56. 2 indexed citations

2.

Starr, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Medication Management in an Acute Care for Elders Program Through Integration of a Clinical Pharmacist. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 33(1). 55–62. 11 indexed citations

3.

Starr, Rebecca & Mihaela Stefan. (2016). Perioperative Assessment of and Care for the Elderly and Frail. 5(2). 224–241. 2 indexed citations

4.

Sabol, Terri J., et al.. (2013). Validation of quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS): Examples from four states. 5 indexed citations

5.

Tout, Kathryn, et al.. (2010). Compendium of Quality Rating Systems and Evaluations: The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment.. 20 indexed citations

6.

Kawana, Masataka, Rebecca Starr, Karen T. Tashima, Diana O. Treaba, & Timothy Flanigan. (2008). Spontaneous perforation of the terminal ileum in an AIDS patient on highly active antiretroviral therapy with disseminated non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 12(6). 603–606. 3 indexed citations

7.

Jagsi, Reshma, Elizabeth A. Guancial, Lori Henault, et al.. (2006). The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective. New England Journal of Medicine. 355(3). 281–287. 653 indexed citations breakdown →

8.

Jagsi, Reshma, et al.. (2004). Outcomes of a pilot faculty mentoring program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 191(6). 1846–1850. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact