Rebecca Jarden

1.3k total citations
58 papers, 734 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Jarden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Jarden has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 734 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in General Health Professions, 19 papers in Clinical Psychology and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Jarden's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (15 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (8 papers). Rebecca Jarden is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (15 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (8 papers). Rebecca Jarden collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Rebecca Jarden's co-authors include Marie Gerdtz, Margaret Sandham, Richard J. Siegert, Jane Koziol‐McLain, Suzanne Kapp, Sara Quirke, Aaron Jarden, Tracey Weiland, Helena Bujalka and Virginia Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Jarden

52 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca Jarden Australia 15 349 271 131 101 73 58 734
Philippa Rasmussen Australia 14 363 1.0× 205 0.8× 110 0.8× 56 0.6× 102 1.4× 40 764
Shahrzad Yektatalab Iran 16 245 0.7× 205 0.8× 53 0.4× 62 0.6× 68 0.9× 73 732
Margareta Asp Sweden 17 339 1.0× 162 0.6× 72 0.5× 56 0.6× 66 0.9× 50 729
Mary C. DiBartolo United States 15 181 0.5× 120 0.4× 172 1.3× 49 0.5× 47 0.6× 28 634
Vicki S. Good United States 9 607 1.7× 266 1.0× 75 0.6× 80 0.8× 218 3.0× 14 897
Hyeonmi Cho United States 17 502 1.4× 266 1.0× 81 0.6× 48 0.5× 70 1.0× 39 770
Cherene Ockerby Australia 15 263 0.8× 88 0.3× 170 1.3× 103 1.0× 52 0.7× 54 757
Mark Gillespie United Kingdom 15 407 1.2× 206 0.8× 148 1.1× 59 0.6× 47 0.6× 42 800
Rengin Acaroğlu Türkiye 15 229 0.7× 75 0.3× 49 0.4× 95 0.9× 93 1.3× 46 585
Zahra Khademian Iran 12 188 0.5× 168 0.6× 59 0.5× 73 0.7× 66 0.9× 37 665

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Jarden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Jarden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Jarden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Jarden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Jarden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Jarden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Jarden. The network helps show where Rebecca Jarden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Jarden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Jarden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Jarden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Jarden. Rebecca Jarden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wong, Pauline, et al.. (2025). Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study. Australian Critical Care. 38(3). 101200–101200. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jones, Virginia, et al.. (2025). Graduate entry nursing students' development of professional nursing self: A longitudinal case study. Nurse Education Today. 151. 106722–106722.
3.
Shannon, Kay, et al.. (2024). Graduate entry nursing students’ well-being and transformation in becoming registered nurses: Phase three of a longitudinal case study. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia. 31(2). 77–83. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bujalka, Helena, et al.. (2024). Implementation and use of the Safewards model in healthcare services: A scoping review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 33(5). 1242–1271.
5.
Piano, Marianne, Rebecca Jarden, Tandy Hastings‐Ison, et al.. (2024). Exploring early- and mid-career academic work wellbeing challenges through a diversity and inclusion lens. BMC Medical Education. 24(1). 1048–1048.
6.
7.
8.
Winnington, Rhona, Kay Shannon, Rebecca Jarden, et al.. (2023). Learning experiences of first year graduate entry nursing students in New Zealand and Australia: a qualitative case study. BMC Nursing. 22(1). 74–74. 9 indexed citations
9.
Sandham, Margaret, et al.. (2022). Nurses' experiences of supporting patients requesting voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative meta‐synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78(10). 3101–3115. 22 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Virginia, Rhona Winnington, Kay Shannon, et al.. (2022). Doing Case Study Research Collaboratively: The Benefits for Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 21. 6 indexed citations
12.
Jarden, Rebecca, et al.. (2022). Nurses' well‐being during the coronavirus (2019) pandemic: A longitudinal mixed‐methods study. Nursing Open. 10(1). 24–35. 7 indexed citations
13.
Jarden, Rebecca, et al.. (2021). New graduate nurse wellbeing, work wellbeing and mental health: A quantitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 121. 103997–103997. 58 indexed citations
14.
Kapp, Suzanne, et al.. (2021). Effect of Safewards on reducing conflict and containment and the experiences of staff and consumers: A mixed‐methods systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 31(1). 199–221. 22 indexed citations
15.
Jarden, Rebecca, Margaret Sandham, Richard J. Siegert, & Jane Koziol‐McLain. (2021). General well‐being of intensive care nurses: A prototype analysis. Nursing in Critical Care. 28(1). 89–100. 3 indexed citations
16.
Jarden, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). Registered Nurses’ experiences of psychological well‐being and ill‐being in their first year of practice: A qualitative meta‐synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(3). 1172–1187. 23 indexed citations
17.
Jarden, Rebecca, et al.. (2020). Epistemological fruit salad: Broadening methodology in positive psychology research to develop contextualised interventions and understandings of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 15(5). 670–674. 7 indexed citations
18.
Jarden, Rebecca, Margaret Sandham, Richard J. Siegert, & Jane Koziol‐McLain. (2019). Conceptual model for intensive care nurse work well‐being: A qualitative secondary analysis. Nursing in Critical Care. 25(2). 74–83. 17 indexed citations
19.
Jarden, Rebecca, Margaret Sandham, Richard J. Siegert, & Jane Koziol‐McLain. (2018). Strengthening workplace well‐being: perceptions of intensive care nurses. Nursing in Critical Care. 24(1). 15–23. 52 indexed citations
20.
Jarden, Rebecca, Margaret Sandham, Richard J. Siegert, & Jane Koziol‐McLain. (2018). Intensive care nurse conceptions of well‐being: a prototype analysis. Nursing in Critical Care. 23(6). 324–331. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026