Mark Gillespie

1.2k total citations
42 papers, 800 citations indexed

About

Mark Gillespie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Research and Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Gillespie has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 800 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Clinical Psychology and 10 papers in Research and Theory. Recurrent topics in Mark Gillespie's work include Nursing education and management (10 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers). Mark Gillespie is often cited by papers focused on Nursing education and management (10 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers). Mark Gillespie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and United States. Mark Gillespie's co-authors include Vidar Melby, Fateme Mohammadi, Hadi Hassankhani, Reza Negarandeh, Hossein Ebrahimi, Leila Valizadeh, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Hossein Habibzadeh, Mahnaz Rakhshan and Zahra Molazem and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Mark Gillespie

41 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Gillespie United Kingdom 15 407 206 148 145 120 42 800
Karen Kesten United States 15 347 0.9× 152 0.7× 147 1.0× 231 1.6× 89 0.7× 44 849
Nicole Blay Australia 19 495 1.2× 108 0.5× 154 1.0× 116 0.8× 124 1.0× 44 986
Ann Sheridan Ireland 16 365 0.9× 226 1.1× 68 0.5× 110 0.8× 84 0.7× 41 854
Elena Gurková Slovakia 16 441 1.1× 156 0.8× 223 1.5× 93 0.6× 54 0.5× 83 815
Gunilla Mårtensson Sweden 19 344 0.8× 95 0.5× 245 1.7× 260 1.8× 140 1.2× 34 992
Rebecca Jarden Australia 15 349 0.9× 271 1.3× 131 0.9× 70 0.5× 52 0.4× 58 734
Füsun Terzioğlu Türkiye 14 295 0.7× 123 0.6× 78 0.5× 239 1.6× 45 0.4× 65 773
Philippa Rasmussen Australia 14 363 0.9× 205 1.0× 110 0.7× 167 1.2× 32 0.3× 40 764
Greg Fairbrother Australia 20 351 0.9× 182 0.9× 46 0.3× 102 0.7× 82 0.7× 55 908
Marzieh Momennasab Iran 17 273 0.7× 248 1.2× 61 0.4× 220 1.5× 47 0.4× 83 894

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gillespie. The network helps show where Mark Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Gillespie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Gillespie. Mark Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tehranineshat, Banafsheh, Mahnaz Rakhshan, Camellia Torabizadeh, Mohammad Fararouei, & Mark Gillespie. (2021). Development and assessment of the psychometric properties of a compassionate care questionnaire for nurses. BMC Nursing. 20(1). 190–190. 10 indexed citations
2.
Tehranineshat, Banafsheh, Mahnaz Rakhshan, Camellia Torabizadeh, Mohammad Fararouei, & Mark Gillespie. (2021). The dignity of burn patients: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses, family caregivers, and patients. BMC Nursing. 20(1). 205–205. 10 indexed citations
3.
Mohammadi, Fateme, et al.. (2019). Caregivers’ perception of women’s dignity in the delivery room: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics. 27(1). 116–126. 13 indexed citations
4.
Mohammadi, Fateme, Mahnaz Rakhshan, Zahra Molazem, & Mark Gillespie. (2019). Parental Competence in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. 37(3). 10 indexed citations
5.
Maddah, Sadat Seyed Bagher, et al.. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to the privacy of Iranian hospitalized patients in government hospitals: a qualitative content analysis.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(2). 74–77. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gillespie, Mark & Ian Rivers. (2017). Assistant grade nurses and nursing students: a diary study. Mental Health Practice. 21(3). 21–25. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ghahramanian, Akram, et al.. (2016). Comparison of effectiveness of reflexology and abdominal massage on constipation among orthopedic patients: A Single-Blind randomized controlled trial. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(10). 33–40. 11 indexed citations
8.
Valizadeh, Leila, et al.. (2016). A qualitative exploration of facilitators and inhibitors influencing nurses' intention to leave clinical nursing. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 50(6). 982–989. 10 indexed citations
9.
Ebrahimi, Hossein, et al.. (2016). Emotional Support for New Graduated Nurses in Clinical Setting: a Qualitative Study. Journal of Caring Sciences. 5(1). 11–21. 58 indexed citations
10.
Valizadeh, Leila, et al.. (2016). Experiences of Iranian Nurses that Intent to Leave the Clinical Nursing: a Content Analysis. Journal of Caring Sciences. 5(2). 169–178. 33 indexed citations
11.
Ebrahimi, Hossein, et al.. (2015). Barriers to support for new graduated nurses in clinical settings: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today. 37. 184–188. 38 indexed citations
12.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2012). The Role of Personality in Argument Evaluation. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 27(2). 40–49. 2 indexed citations
13.
Melby, Vidar, Mark Gillespie, & Stéphanie Martin. (2010). Emergency nurse practitioners: the views of patients and hospital staff at a major acute trust in the UK. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 20(1-2). 236–246. 25 indexed citations
14.
Gillespie, Mark & Paul Flowers. (2009). From the old to the new. Journal of Forensic Nursing. 5(4). 212–219. 8 indexed citations
15.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2007). A final question: witnessed resuscitation. Emergency Nurse. 15(1). 12–16. 4 indexed citations
16.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2007). An exploration of the handover process of critically ill patients between nursing staff from the emergency department and the intensive care unit. Nursing in Critical Care. 12(6). 261–269. 71 indexed citations
17.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2006). Nurse education – the role of the nurse teacher. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 15(5). 639–644. 87 indexed citations
18.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2005). Self-harm: reviewing psychological assessment in emergency departments. Emergency Nurse. 12(10). 20–24. 3 indexed citations
19.
Gillespie, Mark, et al.. (2004). Scaphoid fractures. Emergency Nurse. 12(1). 21–25. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gillespie, Mark & Vidar Melby. (2003). Burnout among nursing staff in accident and emergency and acute medicine: a comparative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 12(6). 842–851. 116 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen Kesten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicole Blay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann Sheridan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elena Gurková Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gunilla Mårtensson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Jarden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Füsun Terzioğlu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philippa Rasmussen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Greg Fairbrother Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marzieh Momennasab
Rankless by CCL
2026